certificate-authoritydevelopment
Is it possible to have a root CA in the enterprise create a CodeSigning certificate (to be used in a Visual Studio solution) that is registered to more than one user? The way it is now, I am the only developer that can publish our solution because the certificate signing the manifests is linked to my account.
Please forgive me if this is common knowledge, but my searches haven't come up with anything useful. Windows Server 2008 R2 and with Windows 7 clients.
Keeping the same private key on your root CA allows for all certificates to continue to validate successfully against the new root; all that's required of you is to trust the new root.
The certificate signing relationship is based on a signature from the private key; keeping the same private key (and, implicitly, the same public key) while generating a new public certificate, with a new validity period and any other new attributes changed as needed, keeps the trust relationship in place. CRLs, too, can continue over from the old cert to the new, as they are, like certificates, signed by the private key.
So, let's verify!
Make a root CA:
openssl req -new -x509 -keyout root.key -out origroot.pem -days 3650 -nodes
Generate a child certificate from it:
openssl genrsa -out cert.key 1024
openssl req -new -key cert.key -out cert.csr
Sign the child cert:
openssl x509 -req -in cert.csr -CA origroot.pem -CAkey root.key -create_serial -out cert.pem
rm cert.csr
All set there, normal certificate relationship. Let's verify the trust:
# openssl verify -CAfile origroot.pem -verbose cert.pem
cert.pem: OK
Ok, so, now let's say 10 years passed. Let's generate a new public certificate from the same root private key.
openssl req -new -key root.key -out newcsr.csr
openssl x509 -req -days 3650 -in newcsr.csr -signkey root.key -out newroot.pem
rm newcsr.csr
And.. did it work?
# openssl verify -CAfile newroot.pem -verbose cert.pem
cert.pem: OK
But.. why? They're different files, right?
# sha1sum newroot.pem
62577e00309e5eacf210d0538cd79c3cdc834020 newroot.pem
# sha1sum origroot.pem
c1d65a6cdfa6fc0e0a800be5edd3ab3b603e1899 origroot.pem
Yes, but, that doesn't mean that the new public key doesn't cryptographically match the signature on the certificate. Different serial numbers, same modulus:
# openssl x509 -noout -text -in origroot.pem
Serial Number:
c0:67:16:c0:8a:6b:59:1d
...
RSA Public Key: (1024 bit)
Modulus (1024 bit):
00:bd:56:b5:26:06:c1:f6:4c:f4:7c:14:2c:0d:dd:
3c:eb:8f:0a:c0:9d:d8:b4:8c:b5:d9:c7:87:4e:25:
8f:7c:92:4d:8f:b3:cc:e9:56:8d:db:f7:fd:d3:57:
1f:17:13:25:e7:3f:79:68:9f:b5:20:c9:ef:2f:3d:
4b:8d:23:fe:52:98:15:53:3a:91:e1:14:05:a7:7a:
9b:20:a9:b2:98:6e:67:36:04:dd:a6:cb:6c:3e:23:
6b:73:5b:f1:dd:9e:70:2b:f7:6e:bd:dc:d1:39:98:
1f:84:2a:ca:6c:ad:99:8a:fa:05:41:68:f8:e4:10:
d7:a3:66:0a:45:bd:0e:cd:9d
# openssl x509 -noout -text -in newroot.pem
Serial Number:
9a:a4:7b:e9:2b:0e:2c:32
...
RSA Public Key: (1024 bit)
Modulus (1024 bit):
00:bd:56:b5:26:06:c1:f6:4c:f4:7c:14:2c:0d:dd:
3c:eb:8f:0a:c0:9d:d8:b4:8c:b5:d9:c7:87:4e:25:
8f:7c:92:4d:8f:b3:cc:e9:56:8d:db:f7:fd:d3:57:
1f:17:13:25:e7:3f:79:68:9f:b5:20:c9:ef:2f:3d:
4b:8d:23:fe:52:98:15:53:3a:91:e1:14:05:a7:7a:
9b:20:a9:b2:98:6e:67:36:04:dd:a6:cb:6c:3e:23:
6b:73:5b:f1:dd:9e:70:2b:f7:6e:bd:dc:d1:39:98:
1f:84:2a:ca:6c:ad:99:8a:fa:05:41:68:f8:e4:10:
d7:a3:66:0a:45:bd:0e:cd:9d
Let's go a little further to verify that it's working in real world certificate validation.
Fire up an Apache instance, and let's give it a go (debian file structure, adjust as needed):
# cp cert.pem /etc/ssl/certs/
# cp origroot.pem /etc/ssl/certs/
# cp newroot.pem /etc/ssl/certs/
# cp cert.key /etc/ssl/private/
We'll set these directives on a VirtualHost listening on 443 - remember, the newroot.pem root certificate didn't even exist when cert.pem was generated and signed.
SSLEngine on
SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/certs/cert.pem
SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/ssl/private/cert.key
SSLCertificateChainFile /etc/ssl/certs/newroot.pem
Let's check out how openssl sees it:
# openssl s_client -showcerts -CAfile newroot.pem -connect localhost:443
Certificate chain
0 s:/C=AU/ST=Some-State/O=Internet Widgits Pty Ltd/CN=server.lan
i:/C=AU/ST=Some-State/O=Internet Widgits Pty Ltd/CN=root
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
...
-----END CERTIFICATE-----
1 s:/C=AU/ST=Some-State/O=Internet Widgits Pty Ltd/CN=root
i:/C=AU/ST=Some-State/O=Internet Widgits Pty Ltd/CN=root
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
MIICHzCCAYgCCQCapHvpKw4sMjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBUMQswCQYDVQQGEwJB
...
-----END CERTIFICATE-----
(this should match the actual contents of newroot.pem)
...
Verify return code: 0 (ok)
Ok, and how about a browser using MS's crypto API? Gotta trust the root, first, then it's all good, with the new root's serial number:
And, we should still be working with the old root, too. Switch Apache's config around:
SSLEngine on
SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/certs/cert.pem
SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/ssl/private/cert.key
SSLCertificateChainFile /etc/ssl/certs/origroot.pem
Do a full restart on Apache, a reload won't switch the certs properly.
# openssl s_client -showcerts -CAfile origroot.pem -connect localhost:443
Certificate chain
0 s:/C=AU/ST=Some-State/O=Internet Widgits Pty Ltd/CN=server.lan
i:/C=AU/ST=Some-State/O=Internet Widgits Pty Ltd/CN=root
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
...
-----END CERTIFICATE-----
1 s:/C=AU/ST=Some-State/O=Internet Widgits Pty Ltd/CN=root
i:/C=AU/ST=Some-State/O=Internet Widgits Pty Ltd/CN=root
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
MIIC3jCCAkegAwIBAgIJAMBnFsCKa1kdMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMFQxCzAJBgNV
...
-----END CERTIFICATE-----
(this should match the actual contents of origroot.pem)
...
Verify return code: 0 (ok)
And, with the MS crypto API browser, Apache's presenting the old root, but the new root's still in the computer's trusted root store. It'll automatically find it and validate the cert against the trusted (new) root, despite Apache presenting a different chain (the old root). After stripping the new root from trusted roots and adding the original root cert, all is well:
So, that's it! Keep the same private key when you renew, swap in the new trusted root, and it pretty much all just works. Good luck!
I haven't tried this, but there is a PKI PowerShell provider from https://pspki.codeplex.com/ that has a lot of interesting looking functions like Revoke-Certificate followed by Remove-Request:
Deletes specified certificate request row from Certification Authority (CA) Database.
This command can be used to reduce CA database size, by deleting unnecessary certificate requests. For example, delete failed requests and unused expired certificate.
Note: after you delete particular row you will unable to retrieve any properties and (if necessary) revoke corresponding certificate.
Best Answer
Not in the way you want. There are few options:
1) issue a personal signing certificate to each developer. Assign CodeSigning certificate template to CA and grant permissions to dev group.
pros: each developer has his own signing certificate.
cons: too many certificates. May be ok for internal (development and testing) purposes only. Is not suitable when you deliver signed binaries to your customers or other 3rd parties.
2) issue a single certificate to developer groups. Export to PFX and provide a copy of this certificate to all devs.
pros: only one certificate is used for signing. Best suitable to sign binaries for external parties.
cons: you are not controlling who signed the file. You see it is signed by a particular certificate, but can't tell who exactly signed the file. It is security degradation.
as per best practices, products for external parties shall be signed by a single and authorized digital certificate that identifies the company. This certificate shall not have copies and should be stored in a secure container, for example smart cards. However, for internal use and if your policy allows this, I would go with option 1, to issue personalized code signing certificates to each developer.