We have some experience using Red Hat Satellite in an environment with ~120 servers. Now we're looking into deploying Ubuntu in parallel for the further growth.
How does Landscape compare to Satellite with regards to features and usability?
linuxredhatUbuntu
We have some experience using Red Hat Satellite in an environment with ~120 servers. Now we're looking into deploying Ubuntu in parallel for the further growth.
How does Landscape compare to Satellite with regards to features and usability?
Best Answer
I think one of the main differences is the fact that in Landscape you cannot have off-line install, with your own servers, you have always to be connected to the Landscape servers...
Also, Satellite went open source, called Spacewalk, i would kill for an opensourced Landscape...
Anyway, there's a project for supporting deb files on spacewalk, but I don't know what status does it have...