I'm using GlusterFS for a file storage cluster and my web apps.
I have two volumes, the storage and the web ones.
Currently I have the web one mounted as NFS, because FUSE was way too slow.
Now I was wondering if there's any big disadvantage and if I should mount the storage one as NFS too.
Best Answer
NFS
uses the standard filesystem caching, the Native GlusterFS uses up application space RAM and is a hard-set number that must defined.source
If you look at the documentation
So in summary: It depends on the requirements. When there is enough RAM available on the system and performance is not overall important
FUSE
seems to be the better choice.