The MD3xxx series is designed to do RAID in the storage controller, and connect to a plain HBA card. You can use an MD1xxx shelf, which is JBOD, with a RAID card like the H810 (or with the plain HBA, with something like ZFS). Making a set of separate RAID0 LUNs and presenting to the H810 would probabaly work, but there's little benefit over presenting RAIDed LUNs from the MD3220 to the H810 (and making them RAID0 there, if required to pass them up to the host OS).
The best solution, though, would be to replace one or the other -- drop to a plain HBA in the server, or replace the MD3220 controllers with MD1220 EMMs (they share a common chassis, just different modules).
Bottom Line - You get what you pay for. Without going into a rediculous amount of detail, because I'll let the internet do it for me.
There is a huge difference between an Enterprise SSD like the Optimus or Sandisk Lightning or the Intel 3700 and the Samsung 840 or OCZ Vector. There's a pretty darn good review Tweak Town SSD Review.
That review highlights the differences chief among them SUSTAINED performance. There are also a few other points that I think make all the difference:
Reliability - Enterprise SSD are made to run in a datacenter environment which typically means a higher sustained operating and level. They are built to run all out for extended periods of time at higher temps in more demanding environments.So please consider a couple things when making this decision:
edit added
- The use of your drives: The drives that are housing something very volatile will get beat up a lot more, stuff like caching drives or database tempdb. By the nature if those types of use those will get over written a lot and that may be worth the extra investment for extended life.
- How prepared you are to deal with replacement and such when the time comes. Depending on your architecture and it's built in reliability (fail-over clusters and the like) maybe you can live with it being down for a while as you order replacement parts. Maybe you can afford to have some the shelf just in case. If you choose to put all your eggs in one basket for what ever reason then I usually counsel people to make that basket as bullet proof as possible. In the end you have to do what is right for the business and your situation.
Data Protection - Enterprise SSDs have protections against power loss and the like built in. They will make sure all writes get committed before they go offline.
The Dell controller should support mixed drives - it actually says it supports mixed drives.
If you have support on your server and you purchase your drives from them then your drives will be supported in your contract. This is a business database on a business class server in a Datacenter, so you have 24x7 support right. Oh and one other thing you should always have hot spares in the box ready to replace a failed device the second it fails. After that you just wait for the courier to show up with your replacement drive and pop it in. When asked how much extra that costs you just make a comparison to the amount of downtime you'll experience if you were to actually lose the server for however long it took. That usually justifies the expense.
I know that a lot of the time in IT the cheap quick solution takes a backseat to the proper solution. I would encourage you to talk to your management and find the money to do it right the first time, because when it comes to storage, the sacrificially lamb can oft times be the business itself.
Best Answer
Yes, this is definitely supported. As Mike Naylor stated, most modern RAID controllers should be able to do this (even desktop systems that support RAID with an integrated controller on the motherboard support this).
The documentation makes no mention of the number of supported disk groups. Limitations are stated in terms of virtual disks, spans, and supported physical disks. As long as your configuration is within those limits, you should be good.
User's Guide
Double Faults and Punctures in RAID Arrays
Based on how much familiarity you seem to have with these controllers and RAID technology in general, I would highly recommend that you read through those two PDFs.
Also note that RAID5 is not generally recommended according to current industry standard best-practices. With the capacities that today's drives are reaching, a 12-disk RAID5 can be particularly prone to issues with data integrity. Don't use RAID5 if the data is important to you - consider RAID6 as an alternative.