Some interesting suggestions here, which all seem to show misunderstanding about how log backups work. A log backup contains ALL transaction log generated since the previous log backup, regardless of what full or differential backups are taken in the interim. Stopping log backups or moving to daily full backups will have no effect on the log backup sizes. The only thing that affects the transaction log is a log backup, once the log backup chain has started.
The only exception to this rule is if the log backup chain has been broken (e.g. by going to the SIMPLE recovery model, reverting from a database snapshot, truncating the log using BACKUP LOG WITH NO_LOG/TRUNCATE_ONLY), in which case the first log backup will contain all the transaction log since the last full backup - which restarts the log backup chain; or if the log backup chain hasn't been started - when you switch into FULL for the first time, you operate in a kind of pseudo-SIMPLE recovery model until the first full backup is taken.
To answer your original question, without going into the SIMPLE recovery model, you're going to have to suck up backing up all the transaction log. Depending on the actions you're taking, you could take more frequent log backups to reduce their size, or do more targeted database.
If you can post some info about the maintenance ops you're doing, I can help you optimize them. Are you, by any chance, doing index rebuilds followed by a shrink database to reclaim the space used by the index rebuilds?
If you have no other activity in the database while the maintenance is occuring, you could do the following:
- make sure user activity is stopped
- take a final log backup (this allows you to recover right up to the point of maintenance starting)
- switch to the SIMPLE recovery model
- perform maintenance - the log will truncate on each checkpoint
- switch to the FULL recovery model and take a full backup
- continue as normal
Hope this helps - looking forward to more info.
Thanks
[Edit: after all the discussion about whether a full backup can alter the size of a subsequent log backup (it can't) I put together a comprehensive blog post with background material and a script that proves it. Check it out at https://www.sqlskills.com/blogs/paul/misconceptions-around-the-log-and-log-backups-how-to-convince-yourself/]
Best Answer
There are a few things that can cause the log to have to grow, even in the SIMPLE recovery model:
There was also a bug in SQL 2000 SP4 that prevented checkpoints from properly clearing the log - see my blog post for more details: Why won't my log clear in SIMPLE recovery mode? SQL 2000 bug or very large VLFs.
My guess is that you've got a long-running transaction.
You shouldn't need to keep shrinking the log - constantly shrinking and growing the log leads to a thing called VLF fragmentation, which can affect performance. Also, whenever the log grows it must be zero-initialized, which causes everything to wait while the initialization takes place. Let the log reach a steady-state size and leave
Checkout the long article I wrote for TechNet Magazine on understanding the log and how it behaves in the various recovery models: Understanding Logging and Recovery in SQL Server.
Hope this helps!