I am using SSHFS to transfer files under Linux between my notebook and my desktop machine. It's easier then NFS because one doesn't have to configure mount points and permissions a priori.
Now, using SSHFS is slower than I would expect from a 100MBit Ethernet connection (sadly, the notebook has no Gigabit Ethernet). I get about 10MiB/sec, instead of 12.5MiB/sec. Can the overhead of protocols "steel" the "rest" (which would be 2.5MiB/sec)?
Switching from IPv4 to IPv6 didn't improved the speed. Using -C for compression made the process even slower.
SSHFS allows to pass parameters to underlying SSH (using -o SSHOPT=VAL). Well, there are a lot of SSH parameters there.
From experience, which of these parameters could improve speed of an SSHFS connection?
Best Answer
You're getting about 80 Mb/s out of your 100 Mb/s link. That's pretty close to the theoretical limit of the link (you'll rarely get anything like the nominal link speed) and is an entirely reasonable figure to achieve.
Beyond that, on top of the overheads of running an encrypted tunnel (SSH) you've also got the TCP overheads, and any other traffic using the connection. I'd say that practically speaking you're unlikely to achieve any better throughput without changing to a protocol with a lower overhead.