On hard disks, throughput and seeking is often faster towards the beginning of the disk, because that data is stored closer to the outer area of the disk, which has more sectors per cylinder. Thus, creating the swap at the beginning of the disk might improve performance.
For a 2.6 Linux kernel, there is no performance difference between a swap partition and an unfragmented swap file. When a swap partition/file is enabled by swapon, the 2.6 kernel finds which disk blocks the swapfile is stored on, so that when it comes time to swap, it doesn't have to deal with the filesystem at all.
Thus, if the swapfile isn't fragmented, it's exactly as if there were a swap partition at its same location. Or put another way, you'd get identical performance if you used a swap partition raw, or formatted it with a filesystem and then created a swapfile that filled all space, since either way on that disk there is a contiguous region used for swapping, which the kernel uses directly.
So if one creates the swapfile when the filesystem is fresh (thus ensuring it's not fragmented and at the beginning of the volume), performance should be identical to having a swap partition just before the volume. Further, if one created the swapfile say in the middle of the volume, with files on either side, one might get better performance, since there's less seeking to swap.
On Linux, if the swapfile is created unfragmented, and never expanded, it cannot become fragmented, at least with normal filesystems like ext3/4. It will always use the same disk blocks, which are contiguous.
I conclude that about the only benefit of a dedicated swap partition is guaranteed unfragmentation when you need to expand it; if your swap will never be expanded, a file created on a fresh filesystem doesn't require an extra partition.
Joining your client computer(s) to the domain won't take away the ability for you to continue logging-on as the local user account you're already using. Group Policy will begin to apply to the computer once it's joined to the domain, but in a stock Windows Server 2008 Active Directory there really won't be any Group Policy settings of consequence applied, so for all intents and purposes the client computer will appear unaffected by joining the domain.
With respect to your concerns re: applicaitons and setttings: Your existing local user account's profile can be migrated to the domain user account's profile, and this will preserve most settings. One item that is particular offensive, however, is applications that store paths referencing "C:\Documents and Settings..." (or "C:\Users..." if you're in a Windows Vista / 7 world) in the registry. In this case, if you want these paths to continue to "work" you must perform the profile migration in such a way that the domain account ends up using the same directory on the local hard disk drive for profile storage as the local account, which ultimately means relocating or deleting the local user profile.
Personally, if I were you, I'd join the client comptuer to the domain, logon once with your domain account, reboot (to be sure that there aren't any open handles to any user registries left open), logon as "Administrator" (assuming the local account you've been using isn't "Administrator"), and use the "Copy To" functionality in the "User Profiles Settings" dialog, reachable through the "Advanced" tab of the "Properties" of "My Computer" to copy the local user account's profile over the domain account's profile. Specify the domain account in the "Permitted to use" section of the "Copy To" dialog.
I'd logon as the domain account (which should then have the look-and-feel of your old local user account), and use REGEDIT to scan thru HKEY_CURRENT_USER looking for references to "C:\Documents and Settings\old-local-user..." and alter them to refer to the new domain account's profile location. It's tedious, but you'll probably have some stupid applications that saved absolute paths to profile locations. (Thanks, stupid app developers...)
The nice thing about this method is that it preserves the local user account. You can still logon as the local user if you find that things aren't working with the domain user account.
The bad thing about this method is that it preserves the local user account. You can still logon as the local user, and in doing so, make modifications to locally stored documents, etc, and end up getting confused about what's what and destroying data.
As soon as the domain user account is working as you'd like it, I'd delete the local user account and its profile. If you're paranoid, back-up the profile directory and just disable the local user account. Personally, I'd try to make a clean break so that you're not kicking that old user profile directory down the beach forever.
Finally, if you don't have access to someone with good Active Directory expertise re: designing your Active Directory, using Group Policy to deploy software / centrally control update deployment / centrally store user data files / leverage romaing user profiles, etc, I'd encourage you to look for somebody who can spend a couple of hours helping you out. You can get a lot of really neat functionality out of Active Directory, and some very simple Group Policy settings can be used to get user data centrally stored and backed up, get Windows and Microsoft application updates being centrally deployed and managed, etc. It's good stuff, and can save you a lot of time and headaches down the road.
Good luck!
Best Answer
I don't think you can pin down a single "point" where it suddenly becomes better to use a domain vs. a workgroup.
That said, I generally consider around 5 computers to be the max size for a workgroup. Any larger than that, and domains start to have some attractive advantages that make it worth the effort.
Some criteria that might suggest a domain is the right choice:
There are some factors that make a domain impossible of course:
Like so many things, the choice of whether to set up a simple workgroup or a domain is a very personal, subjective one... anyway, these are some of the things that guide my decision when I have to make that choice. Hopefully they will help you as well.