Java Type Casting – Type Parameterized Methods to Avoid Casting

In a weakly-typed language, type-casting exists to remove ambiguity in typed operations, when otherwise the compiler/interpreter would use order or other rules to make an assumption of which operation to use.

Normally I would say PHP follows this pattern, but of the cases I've checked, PHP has behaved counter-intuitively in each.

Here are those cases, using JavaScript as a comparison language.

String Concatentation

Obviously this is not a problem in PHP because there are separate string concatenation (.) and addition (+) operators.

var a = 5;
var b = "10"
var incorrect = a + b; // "510"
var correct = a + Number(b); // 15

String Comparison

Often in computer systems "5" is greater than "10" because it doesn't interpret it as a number. Not so in PHP, which, even if both are strings, realizes they are numbers and removes the need for a cast):

console.log("5" > "10" ? "true" : "false"); // true

echo "5" > "10" ? "true" : "false";  // false!

Function signature typing

PHP implements a bare-bones type-checking on function signatures, but unfortunately it's so flawed it's probably rarely usable.

I thought I might be doing something wrong, but a comment on the docs confirms that built-in types other than array cannot be used in PHP function signatures - though the error message is misleading.

function testprint(string $a) {
    echo $a;
}

$test = 5;
testprint((string)5); // "Catchable fatal error: Argument 1 passed to testprint()
                      //  must be an instance of string, string given" WTF?

And unlike any other language I know, even if you use a type it understands, null can no longer be passed to that argument (must be an instance of array, null given). How stupid.

Boolean interpretation

[Edit]: This one is new. I thought of another case, and again the logic is reversed from JavaScript.

console.log("0" ? "true" : "false"); // True, as expected. Non-empty string.

echo "0" ? "true" : "false"; // False! This one probably causes a lot of bugs.

So in conclusion, the only useful case I can think of is... (drumroll)

Type truncation

In other words, when you have a value of one type (say string) and you want to interpret it as another type (int) and you want to force it to become one of the valid set of values in that type:

$val = "test";
$val2 = "10";
$intval = (int)$val; // 0
$intval2 = (int)$val2; // 10
$boolval = (bool)$intval // false
$boolval2 = (bool)$intval2 // true
$props = (array)$myobject // associative array of $myobject's properties

I can't see what upcasting (to a type that encompasses more values) would really ever gain you.

So while I disagree with your proposed use of typing (you essentially are proposing static typing, but with the ambiguity that only if it was force-cast into a type would it throw an error — which would cause confusion), I think it's a good question, because apparently casting has very little purpose in PHP.

An implementation of an interface is the realization of that interface. Realization is being implemented within the class. Just return an instance of the class (A or B) which realizes the return-type interface.

interface IA{}   
class A: IA{}

class UseIA
{
  public IA DesiredMethod()
  {
    return new A();
  }
}