ES2015 introduced the let
and const
keywords, which essentially have the same semantics apart from reassignment. (const
can be seen as a final
variable in languages like Java.)
I see the point of switching from var
to let
, but many online articles recommend using const
whenever possible (in some form of manual SSA).
However, I recall in the question on Java final variables, the accepted most popular answer adviced against using final
local variables because it makes the code more difficult to understand.
This is reflected in reality as a number of code review comments questioned the "over-use" of const
on local variables.
So does const
still reduces readability in JavaScript?
Best Answer
*sigh*... This is why immutable needs to be the default. Even the referenced Java answer suggests this. Note that that answer does not recommend removing
final
modifiers, just that the author of that answer wouldn't add them in new code (for local variables) because they "clutter up" the code.However, there is a difference between JavaScript and Java here. In Java,
final
is an additional modifier on a variable declaration, so you get:In JavaScript, though,
const
is just an alternate variable declaration, so the situation is:I don't think two more characters constitutes "clutter". If the alternative being suggested is just
foo = 3
then the reviewers are just wrong.Personally, I would always use
const
when applicable and would suggest it's inclusion in a code review. But then I'm a Haskeller, so I would be like that. But also, JavaScript tends to be more pervasively mutable and have a worse debugging story when things do unexpectedly change, that I would sayconst
in JavaScript is more valuable thanfinal
in Java (though it's still valuable there.)As Ixrec points out,
const
only controls the modifiability of the binding, not the object that is bound. So it's perfectly legal to write:This can be used as an argument against using
const
as someone may be surprised when an "unmodifiable" object is modified. Newer versions of JavaScript do have a mechanism to actually make objects unmodifiable, namelyObject.freeze
. It makes a good addition toconst
(though only use it on objects that you create, for example, asObject.freeze({ ... })
). This combination will communicate and enforce your intent. If used consistently, the times where you are mutating things will stick out and clearly signal non-trivial data flow.