It seems to me it would be very useful to use Javascript for general server side scripting tasks as it has more or less the same features as Perl and Python. But AFAIK there are no generally available Javascript interpreters for the major machine architectures. I guess the other problem may be lack of libraries but surely these would come if the interpreters were there. Google's V8 maybe could be a starting point. Does anyone think we'll see this soon?
Javascript – Why No Native Interpreters for Windows/Mac/Linux?
javascript
Related Solutions
Because javascript doesn't have feature like namespaces, and you can mess up pretty easily with all sort of global objects.
So it is important to be able to isolate some code in its own execution environment. Closure are perfect for that.
This usage of closure doesn't make sense in a language like C# where you have namespaces, classes and so on to isolates code and not putting everything in the global scope.
A very common practice for javascript code is writting it like this :
(function(){
// Some code
})();
As you can see, this is an anonymous function declaration, followed immediately by its execution. Thus, everything defined within the function is impossible to access from outside, and you will not mess up the global scope. The execution context of this function will remain alive as long as some code uses it, like nested functions defined within this context, that you can pass as callback or whatever.
Javascript is a very different language than C#. It's not object oriented, it is prototype oriented. This leads to very different practices at the end.
Anyway, closures are good, so use them, even in C#!
EDIT: After some discuss on stackoverflow's chat, I think this anwer has to be precised.
The function in the sample code isn't a closure. However, this fucntion can define local variable and nested functions. All nested functions that use these local variables are closures.
This is usefull to share some data across a set of functions without messing up the global scope. This is the most common use of closure in javascript.
Closure are way more powerfull than just sharing some data like this, but let's be realistic, most programmers don't know a thing about functionnal programming. In C# you would have used class or a namespace for these kind of use, but JS does not provide this functionnality.
You can do way more with closure than just protect the global scope, but this is what you'll see in JS source code.
Yes! You definitely can do that with Node.js or Rhino. For example the coffeescript compiler is nothing but a node.js script.
I will admit that it is not generally my first choice for desktop scripting but I see no reason why it would not work quite well for a number of tasks.
Best Answer
Node.js is exactly what you're asking for ... and more.
In addition to being a JavaScript runtime it also provides APIs for common operations, such as file system access (JavaScript on the browser doesn't really need that) and network IO.
It's marketed for building network application (and it's great at that!), but it's really a general purpose JavaScript runtime that you can use to build anything you want. Also, it is based on V8.