I think what you want is this:
ASP.NET MVC1
Html.ActionLink(article.Title,
"Login", // <-- Controller Name.
"Item", // <-- ActionMethod
new { id = article.ArticleID }, // <-- Route arguments.
null // <-- htmlArguments .. which are none. You need this value
// otherwise you call the WRONG method ...
// (refer to comments, below).
)
This uses the following method ActionLink signature:
public static string ActionLink(this HtmlHelper htmlHelper,
string linkText,
string controllerName,
string actionName,
object values,
object htmlAttributes)
ASP.NET MVC2
two arguments have been switched around
Html.ActionLink(article.Title,
"Item", // <-- ActionMethod
"Login", // <-- Controller Name.
new { id = article.ArticleID }, // <-- Route arguments.
null // <-- htmlArguments .. which are none. You need this value
// otherwise you call the WRONG method ...
// (refer to comments, below).
)
This uses the following method ActionLink signature:
public static string ActionLink(this HtmlHelper htmlHelper,
string linkText,
string actionName,
string controllerName,
object values,
object htmlAttributes)
ASP.NET MVC3+
arguments are in the same order as MVC2, however the id value is no longer required:
Html.ActionLink(article.Title,
"Item", // <-- ActionMethod
"Login", // <-- Controller Name.
new { article.ArticleID }, // <-- Route arguments.
null // <-- htmlArguments .. which are none. You need this value
// otherwise you call the WRONG method ...
// (refer to comments, below).
)
This avoids hard-coding any routing logic into the link.
<a href="/Item/Login/5">Title</a>
This will give you the following html output, assuming:
article.Title = "Title"
article.ArticleID = 5
- you still have the following route defined
.
.
routes.MapRoute(
"Default", // Route name
"{controller}/{action}/{id}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = "" } // Parameter defaults
);
Here's what I came up with, and it's working for me. I added the following method(s) to my controller base class. (You can always make these static methods somewhere else that accept a controller as a parameter I suppose)
MVC2 .ascx style
protected string RenderViewToString<T>(string viewPath, T model) {
ViewData.Model = model;
using (var writer = new StringWriter()) {
var view = new WebFormView(ControllerContext, viewPath);
var vdd = new ViewDataDictionary<T>(model);
var viewCxt = new ViewContext(ControllerContext, view, vdd,
new TempDataDictionary(), writer);
viewCxt.View.Render(viewCxt, writer);
return writer.ToString();
}
}
Razor .cshtml style
public string RenderRazorViewToString(string viewName, object model)
{
ViewData.Model = model;
using (var sw = new StringWriter())
{
var viewResult = ViewEngines.Engines.FindPartialView(ControllerContext,
viewName);
var viewContext = new ViewContext(ControllerContext, viewResult.View,
ViewData, TempData, sw);
viewResult.View.Render(viewContext, sw);
viewResult.ViewEngine.ReleaseView(ControllerContext, viewResult.View);
return sw.GetStringBuilder().ToString();
}
}
Edit: added Razor code.
Best Answer
I like to use Url.Action() and Url.Content() like this:
Strictly speaking, the Url.Content is only needed for pathing is not really part of the answer to your question.
Thanks to @BrianLegg for pointing out that this should use the new Razor view syntax. Example has been updated accordingly.