C# – Internal abstract class: how to hide usage outside assembly

abstract classaccess-modifierscinheritance

I have a common assembly/project that has an abstract base class, then several derived classes that I want to make public to other assemblies.

I don't want the abstract base class to show up in these other assemblies in Intellisense, so I thought I'd make it internal, but I get this error:

Inconsistent accessibility: base class 'Settings' is less accessible than class 'IrcSettings' ….

I don't really get this. I am forced to make the abstract Settings class public, and thus visible outside this assembly.

How can I make this class internal instead?

Best Answer

As I understand, you want your abstract class to only be implemented by other classes in the same assembly (e.g. it is internal) but the derived classes could be public.

The way to do this is to make the abstract base class public, but give it an internal default constructor:

public abstract class MyClass
{
    internal MyClass() { }
}

This will allow MyClass (and hence its members) to be visible and usable to classes outside your assembly, but classes outside your assembly cannot inherit from it (will get a compile error).

Edit: If classes which can be seen by external assemblies inherit from MyClass, you cannot prevent MyClass from also being seen - e.g., showing up in Intellisense. However, you can prevent them from being used by following the above.

Related Solutions

Java – Can an abstract class have a constructor

Yes, an abstract class can have a constructor. Consider this:

abstract class Product { 
    int multiplyBy;
    public Product( int multiplyBy ) {
        this.multiplyBy = multiplyBy;
    }

    public int mutiply(int val) {
       return multiplyBy * val;
    }
}

class TimesTwo extends Product {
    public TimesTwo() {
        super(2);
    }
}

class TimesWhat extends Product {
    public TimesWhat(int what) {
        super(what);
    }
}

The superclass Product is abstract and has a constructor. The concrete class TimesTwo has a constructor that just hardcodes the value 2. The concrete class TimesWhat has a constructor that allows the caller to specify the value.

Abstract constructors will frequently be used to enforce class constraints or invariants such as the minimum fields required to setup the class.

NOTE: As there is no default (or no-arg) constructor in the parent abstract class, the constructor used in subclass must explicitly call the parent constructor.

Python – Difference between abstract class and interface in Python

What you'll see sometimes is the following:

class Abstract1:
    """Some description that tells you it's abstract,
    often listing the methods you're expected to supply."""

    def aMethod(self):
        raise NotImplementedError("Should have implemented this")

Because Python doesn't have (and doesn't need) a formal Interface contract, the Java-style distinction between abstraction and interface doesn't exist. If someone goes through the effort to define a formal interface, it will also be an abstract class. The only differences would be in the stated intent in the docstring.

And the difference between abstract and interface is a hairsplitting thing when you have duck typing.

Java uses interfaces because it doesn't have multiple inheritance.

Because Python has multiple inheritance, you may also see something like this

class SomeAbstraction:
    pass  # lots of stuff - but missing something

class Mixin1:
    def something(self):
        pass  # one implementation

class Mixin2:
    def something(self):
        pass  # another

class Concrete1(SomeAbstraction, Mixin1):
    pass

class Concrete2(SomeAbstraction, Mixin2):
    pass

This uses a kind of abstract superclass with mixins to create concrete subclasses that are disjoint.

Best Answer

Related Solutions

Java – Can an abstract class have a constructor

Python – Difference between abstract class and interface in Python

Related Topic