Difference between macro and preprocessor

cc-preprocessor

From what I understand , #define blah 8 is a macro . While , # is the pre-processor directive .

Can we say #include,#if,#ifdef,etc. are also macros , or are they called something else ? Or is it that macro is just a term used for #define statements only?

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Best Answer

Lines that start with # are preprocessing directives. They are directives that tell the preprocessor to do something.

#include, #if, #ifdef, #ifndef, #else, #elif, #endif, #define, #undef, #line, #error, and #pragma are all preprocessing directives. (A line containing only # is also a preprocessing directive, but it has no effect.)

#define blah 8 is a preprocessing directive, it is not a macro. blah is a macro. This #define preprocessing directive defines the macro named blah as an object-like macro replaced by the token 8.

Related Solutions

C++ – the difference between #include and #include “filename”

In practice, the difference is in the location where the preprocessor searches for the included file.

For #include <filename> the preprocessor searches in an implementation dependent manner, normally in search directories pre-designated by the compiler/IDE. This method is normally used to include standard library header files.

For #include "filename" the preprocessor searches first in the same directory as the file containing the directive, and then follows the search path used for the #include <filename> form. This method is normally used to include programmer-defined header files.

A more complete description is available in the GCC documentation on search paths.

The difference between ++i and i++

++i will increment the value of i, and then return the incremented value.
```
 i = 1;
 j = ++i;
 (i is 2, j is 2)
```
i++ will increment the value of i, but return the original value that i held before being incremented.
```
 i = 1;
 j = i++;
 (i is 2, j is 1)
```

For a for loop, either works. ++i seems more common, perhaps because that is what is used in K&R.

In any case, follow the guideline "prefer ++i over i++" and you won't go wrong.

There's a couple of comments regarding the efficiency of ++i and i++. In any non-student-project compiler, there will be no performance difference. You can verify this by looking at the generated code, which will be identical.

The efficiency question is interesting... here's my attempt at an answer: Is there a performance difference between i++ and ++i in C?

As @OnFreund notes, it's different for a C++ object, since operator++() is a function and the compiler can't know to optimize away the creation of a temporary object to hold the intermediate value.

Best Answer

Related Solutions

C++ – the difference between #include and #include “filename”

The difference between ++i and i++

Related Topic