eclipsepluginssvn
Subclipse, Subversive, or something else?
There's a bit of debate around the topic, can we come to some conclusion here?
EDIT:
It's been a couple months now, and I ended up deciding the plugin slowed Eclipse down too much, and was a hassle to use every time I changed a file from outside Eclipse.
I ditched the plugin all together and just went with TortiseSVN.
Hmm, not sure I agree with Nick re tag being similar to a branch. A tag is just a marker
Trunk would be the main body of development, originating from the start of the project until the present.
Branch will be a copy of code derived from a certain point in the trunk that is used for applying major changes to the code while preserving the integrity of the code in the trunk. If the major changes work according to plan, they are usually merged back into the trunk.
Tag will be a point in time on the trunk or a branch that you wish to preserve. The two main reasons for preservation would be that either this is a major release of the software, whether alpha, beta, RC or RTM, or this is the most stable point of the software before major revisions on the trunk were applied.
In open source projects, major branches that are not accepted into the trunk by the project stakeholders can become the bases for forks -- e.g., totally separate projects that share a common origin with other source code.
The branch and tag subtrees are distinguished from the trunk in the following ways:
Subversion allows sysadmins to create hook scripts which are triggered for execution when certain events occur; for instance, committing a change to the repository. It is very common for a typical Subversion repository implementation to treat any path containing "/tag/" to be write-protected after creation; the net result is that tags, once created, are immutable (at least to "ordinary" users). This is done via the hook scripts, which enforce the immutability by preventing further changes if tag is a parent node of the changed object.
Subversion also has added features, since version 1.5, relating to "branch merge tracking" so that changes committed to a branch can be merged back into the trunk with support for incremental, "smart" merging.
(This answer has been updated to match SVN 1.8 and 1.9's behaviour)
You have 2 questions:
By "ignored file" I mean the file won't appear in lists even as "unversioned": your SVN client will pretend the file doesn't exist at all in the filesystem.
Ignored files are specified by a "file pattern". The syntax and format of file patterns is explained in SVN's online documentation: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.advanced.props.special.ignore.html "File Patterns in Subversion".
Subversion, as of version 1.8 (June 2013) and later, supports 3 different ways of specifying file patterns. Here's a summary with examples:
global-ignores option:global-ignores list won't be shared by other users, and it applies to all repos you checkout onto your computer.C:\Users\{you}\AppData\Roaming\Subversion\configSoftware\Tigris.org\Subversion\Config\Miscellany\global-ignores in both HKLM and HKCU.~/.subversion/configsvn:ignore property, which is set on directories (not files):.gitignore works.svn:ignore is applied to directories and is non-recursive or inherited. Any file or immediate subdirectory of the parent directory that matches the File Pattern will be excluded.While SVN 1.8 adds the concept of "inherited properties", the svn:ignore property itself is ignored in non-immediate descendant directories:
cd ~/myRepoRoot # Open an existing repo.
echo "foo" > "ignoreThis.txt" # Create a file called "ignoreThis.txt".
svn status # Check to see if the file is ignored or not.
> ? ./ignoreThis.txt
> 1 unversioned file # ...it is NOT currently ignored.
svn propset svn:ignore "ignoreThis.txt" . # Apply the svn:ignore property to the "myRepoRoot" directory.
svn status
> 0 unversioned files # ...but now the file is ignored!
cd subdirectory # now open a subdirectory.
echo "foo" > "ignoreThis.txt" # create another file named "ignoreThis.txt".
svn status
> ? ./subdirectory/ignoreThis.txt # ...and is is NOT ignored!
> 1 unversioned file
(So the file ./subdirectory/ignoreThis is not ignored, even though "ignoreThis.txt" is applied on the . repo root).
Therefore, to apply an ignore list recursively you must use svn propset svn:ignore <filePattern> . --recursive.
<filePattern> value is different in a child directory then the child's value completely overrides the parents, so there is no "additive" effect.<filePattern> on the root ., then you must change it with --recursive to overwrite it on the child and descendant directories.I note that the command-line syntax is counter-intuitive.
svn ignore pathToFileToIgnore.txt however this is not how SVN's ignore feature works.svn:global-ignores property. Requires SVN 1.8 (June 2013):svn:ignore, except it makes use of SVN 1.8's "inherited properties" feature.svn:ignore, the file pattern is automatically applied in every descendant directory (not just immediate children).
svn:global-ignores with the --recursive flag, as inherited ignore file patterns are automatically applied as they're inherited.Running the same set of commands as in the previous example, but using svn:global-ignores instead:
cd ~/myRepoRoot # Open an existing repo
echo "foo" > "ignoreThis.txt" # Create a file called "ignoreThis.txt"
svn status # Check to see if the file is ignored or not
> ? ./ignoreThis.txt
> 1 unversioned file # ...it is NOT currently ignored
svn propset svn:global-ignores "ignoreThis.txt" .
svn status
> 0 unversioned files # ...but now the file is ignored!
cd subdirectory # now open a subdirectory
echo "foo" > "ignoreThis.txt" # create another file named "ignoreThis.txt"
svn status
> 0 unversioned files # the file is ignored here too!
This whole arrangement was confusing for me, because TortoiseSVN's terminology (as used in their Windows Explorer menu system) was initially misleading to me - I was unsure what the significance of the Ignore menu's "Add recursively", "Add *" and "Add " options. I hope this post explains how the Ignore feature ties-in to the SVN Properties feature. That said, I suggest using the command-line to set ignored files so you get a feel for how it works instead of using the GUI, and only using the GUI to manipulate properties after you're comfortable with the command-line.
The command svn status will hide ignored files (that is, files that match an RGA global-ignores pattern, or match an immediate parent directory's svn:ignore pattern or match any ancesor directory's svn:global-ignores pattern.
Use the --no-ignore option to see those files listed. Ignored files have a status of I, then pipe the output to grep to only show lines starting with "I".
The command is:
svn status --no-ignore | grep "^I"
For example:
svn status
> ? foo # An unversioned file
> M modifiedFile.txt # A versioned file that has been modified
svn status --no-ignore
> ? foo # An unversioned file
> I ignoreThis.txt # A file matching an svn:ignore pattern
> M modifiedFile.txt # A versioned file that has been modified
svn status --no-ignore | grep "^I"
> I ignoreThis.txt # A file matching an svn:ignore pattern
ta-da!
Best Answer
This depends. Subclipse has superior support for checking out projects as maven projects - this is the sole reason we use Subclipse. Other than that, I have noticed subclipse bugs with syncing with SVN.
Subversive is much better at detecting new files to add to version control, and is also far superior with merging code from a branch, or even syncing with SVN (fewer bugs, etc.). So really, you should ask yourself what value you want. If you're not using maven, I would definitely go for Subversive.