IDE and Assembler for 8086/88

Since JSR 305 (whose goal was to standardize @NonNull and @Nullable) has been dormant for several years, I'm afraid there is no good answer. All we can do is to find a pragmatic solution and mine is as follows:

Syntax

From a purely stylistic standpoint I would like to avoid any reference to IDE, framework or any toolkit except Java itself.

This rules out:

• android.support.annotation
• edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations
• org.eclipse.jdt.annotation
• org.jetbrains.annotations
• org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual
• lombok.NonNull

Which leaves us with either javax.validation.constraints or javax.annotation. The former comes with JEE. If this is better than javax.annotation, which might come eventually with JSE or never at all, is a matter of debate. I personally prefer javax.annotation because I wouldn't like the JEE dependency.

This leaves us with

javax.annotation

which is also the shortest one.

There is only one syntax which would even be better: java.annotation.Nullable. As other packages graduated from javax to java in the past, the javax.annotation would be a step in the right direction.

Implementation

I was hoping that they all have basically the same trivial implementation, but a detailed analysis showed that this is not true.

First for the similarities:

The @NonNull annotations all have the line

public @interface NonNull {}

except for

• org.jetbrains.annotations which calls it @NotNull and has a trivial implementation
• javax.annotation which has a longer implementation
• javax.validation.constraints which also calls it @NotNull and has an implementation

The @Nullableannotations all have the line

public @interface Nullable {}

except for (again) the org.jetbrains.annotations with their trivial implementation.

For the differences:

A striking one is that

• javax.annotation
• javax.validation.constraints
• org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual

all have runtime annotations (@Retention(RUNTIME)), while

• android.support.annotation
• edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations
• org.eclipse.jdt.annotation
• org.jetbrains.annotations

are only compile time (@Retention(CLASS)).

As described in this SO answer the impact of runtime annotations is smaller than one might think, but they have the benefit of enabling tools to do runtime checks in addition to the compile time ones.

Another important difference is where in the code the annotations can be used. There are two different approaches. Some packages use JLS 9.6.4.1 style contexts. The following table gives an overview:

                                FIELD   METHOD  PARAMETER LOCAL_VARIABLE 
android.support.annotation      X       X       X   
edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations X       X       X         X
org.jetbrains.annotation        X       X       X         X
lombok                          X       X       X         X
javax.validation.constraints    X       X       X   

org.eclipse.jdt.annotation, javax.annotation and org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual use the contexts defined in JLS 4.11, which is in my opinion the right way to do it.

This leaves us with

• javax.annotation
• org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual

in this round.

Code

To help you to compare further details yourself I list the code of every annotation below. To make comparison easier I removed comments, imports and the @Documented annotation. (they all had @Documented except for the classes from the Android package). I reordered the lines and @Target fields and normalized the qualifications.

package android.support.annotation;
@Retention(CLASS)
@Target({FIELD, METHOD, PARAMETER})
public @interface NonNull {}

---

package edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations;
@Retention(CLASS)
@Target({FIELD, METHOD, PARAMETER, LOCAL_VARIABLE})
public @interface NonNull {}

---

package org.eclipse.jdt.annotation;
@Retention(CLASS)
@Target({ TYPE_USE })
public @interface NonNull {}

---

package org.jetbrains.annotations;
@Retention(CLASS)
@Target({FIELD, METHOD, PARAMETER, LOCAL_VARIABLE})
public @interface NotNull {String value() default "";}

---

package javax.annotation;
@TypeQualifier
@Retention(RUNTIME)
public @interface Nonnull {
    When when() default When.ALWAYS;
    static class Checker implements TypeQualifierValidator<Nonnull> {
        public When forConstantValue(Nonnull qualifierqualifierArgument,
                Object value) {
            if (value == null)
                return When.NEVER;
            return When.ALWAYS;
        }
    }
}

---

package org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual;
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Target({TYPE_USE, TYPE_PARAMETER})
@SubtypeOf(MonotonicNonNull.class)
@ImplicitFor(
    types = {
        TypeKind.PACKAGE,
        TypeKind.INT,
        TypeKind.BOOLEAN,
        TypeKind.CHAR,
        TypeKind.DOUBLE,
        TypeKind.FLOAT,
        TypeKind.LONG,
        TypeKind.SHORT,
        TypeKind.BYTE
    },
    literals = {LiteralKind.STRING}
)
@DefaultQualifierInHierarchy
@DefaultFor({TypeUseLocation.EXCEPTION_PARAMETER})
@DefaultInUncheckedCodeFor({TypeUseLocation.PARAMETER, TypeUseLocation.LOWER_BOUND})
public @interface NonNull {}

---

For completeness, here are the @Nullable implementations:

package android.support.annotation;
@Retention(CLASS)
@Target({METHOD, PARAMETER, FIELD})
public @interface Nullable {}

---

package edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations;
@Target({FIELD, METHOD, PARAMETER, LOCAL_VARIABLE})
@Retention(CLASS)
public @interface Nullable {}

---

package org.eclipse.jdt.annotation;
@Retention(CLASS)
@Target({ TYPE_USE })
public @interface Nullable {}

---

package org.jetbrains.annotations;
@Retention(CLASS)
@Target({FIELD, METHOD, PARAMETER, LOCAL_VARIABLE})
public @interface Nullable {String value() default "";}

---

package javax.annotation;
@TypeQualifierNickname
@Nonnull(when = When.UNKNOWN)
@Retention(RUNTIME)
public @interface Nullable {}

---

package org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual;
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Target({TYPE_USE, TYPE_PARAMETER})
@SubtypeOf({})
@ImplicitFor(
    literals = {LiteralKind.NULL},
    typeNames = {java.lang.Void.class}
)
@DefaultInUncheckedCodeFor({TypeUseLocation.RETURN, TypeUseLocation.UPPER_BOUND})
public @interface Nullable {}

The following two packages have no @Nullable, so I list them separately; Lombok has a pretty boring @NonNull. In javax.validation.constraints the @NonNull is actually a @NotNull and it has a longish implementation.

package lombok;
@Retention(CLASS)
@Target({FIELD, METHOD, PARAMETER, LOCAL_VARIABLE})
public @interface NonNull {}

---

package javax.validation.constraints;
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Target({ FIELD, METHOD, ANNOTATION_TYPE, CONSTRUCTOR, PARAMETER })
@Constraint(validatedBy = {})
public @interface NotNull {
    String message() default "{javax.validation.constraints.NotNull.message}";
    Class<?>[] groups() default { };
    Class<? extends Payload>[] payload() default {};
    @Target({ METHOD, FIELD, ANNOTATION_TYPE, CONSTRUCTOR, PARAMETER })
    @Retention(RUNTIME)
    @Documented
    @interface List {
        NotNull[] value();
    }
}

---

Support

From my experience, javax.annotation is at least supported by Eclipse and the Checker Framework out of the box.

Summary

My ideal annotation would be the java.annotation syntax with the Checker Framework implementation.

If you don't intend to use the Checker Framework the javax.annotation (JSR-305) is still your best bet for the time being.

If you are willing to buy into the Checker Framework just use their org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.

---

Sources

• android.support.annotation from android-5.1.1_r1.jar
• edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations from findbugs-annotations-1.0.0.jar
• org.eclipse.jdt.annotation from org.eclipse.jdt.annotation_2.1.0.v20160418-1457.jar
• org.jetbrains.annotations from jetbrains-annotations-13.0.jar
• javax.annotation from gwt-dev-2.5.1-sources.jar
• org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual from checker-framework-2.1.9.zip
• lombok from lombok commit f6da35e4c4f3305ecd1b415e2ab1b9ef8a9120b4
• javax.validation.constraints from validation-api-1.0.0.GA-sources.jar

Because Floating Point Math is not Associative. The way you group the operands in floating point multiplication has an effect on the numerical accuracy of the answer.

As a result, most compilers are very conservative about reordering floating point calculations unless they can be sure that the answer will stay the same, or unless you tell them you don't care about numerical accuracy. For example: the -fassociative-math option of gcc which allows gcc to reassociate floating point operations, or even the -ffast-math option which allows even more aggressive tradeoffs of accuracy against speed.