Java – Debug a java application without starting the JVM with debug arguments

debuggingjavajvmjvm-arguments

Normally to attach a debuger to a running jvm you would need start the jvm with arguments such as the following:

> java -Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=1000,server=y,suspend=n

Now if I want to debug a process that wasn't started in debug mode, what can I do?

This situation arrises when a production system (i.e. started without debug args) exhibits a 'random' (I use the term loosely) bug. So I can't restart the jvm with the appropriate arguments, because nobody knows how to reproduce the bug again. Is it impossible to attach to the JVM in this situation?

Just to clarify it is not possible to use tools like jdb to attach to already running JVMs unless they were started in debug mode

from the JVM man page

Another way to use jdb is by attaching it to a Java VM that is
already running. A VM that is to be
debugged with jdb must be started with
the following options:

Best Answer

You may be able to use jsadebugd (JDK) to attach a debug server to the process (available on Windows with the Debugging Tools for Windows). It is marked as experimental, so you may want to try it out on a test machine first.

Usage:

jsadebugd <pid>
jdb -connect sun.jvm.hotspot.jdi.SADebugServerAttachingConnector:debugServerName=localhost

The connector name withe arg can be found using jdb -listconnectors.

Related Solutions

Java – What are the differences between a HashMap and a Hashtable in Java

There are several differences between HashMap and Hashtable in Java:

Hashtable is synchronized, whereas HashMap is not. This makes HashMap better for non-threaded applications, as unsynchronized Objects typically perform better than synchronized ones.
Hashtable does not allow null keys or values. HashMap allows one null key and any number of null values.
One of HashMap's subclasses is LinkedHashMap, so in the event that you'd want predictable iteration order (which is insertion order by default), you could easily swap out the HashMap for a LinkedHashMap. This wouldn't be as easy if you were using Hashtable.

Since synchronization is not an issue for you, I'd recommend HashMap. If synchronization becomes an issue, you may also look at ConcurrentHashMap.

Java – How does the Java ‘for each’ loop work

for (Iterator<String> i = someIterable.iterator(); i.hasNext();) {
    String item = i.next();
    System.out.println(item);
}

Note that if you need to use i.remove(); in your loop, or access the actual iterator in some way, you cannot use the for ( : ) idiom, since the actual iterator is merely inferred.

As was noted by Denis Bueno, this code works for any object that implements the Iterable interface.

Also, if the right-hand side of the for (:) idiom is an array rather than an Iterable object, the internal code uses an int index counter and checks against array.length instead. See the Java Language Specification.

Best Answer

Related Solutions

Java – What are the differences between a HashMap and a Hashtable in Java

Java – How does the Java ‘for each’ loop work

Related Topic