Java – Difference between Groovy def and Java Object

groovyjava

I'm trying to figure out the difference between

Groovy:

def name = "stephanie"

Java:

Object name = "stephanie"

as both seem to act as objects in that to interact with them i have to cast them to their original intended type.

I was originally on a search for a java equivalent of C#'s dynamic class ( Java equivalent to C# dynamic class type? ) and it was suggested to look at Groovy's def

for example my impression of groovy's def is that I could do the following:

def DOB = new Date(1998,5,23);
int x = DOB.getYear();

however this wont build

thanks,steph

Solution edit:
Turns out the mistake iw as making is I had a groovy class wtih public properties (in my example above DOB) defined with def but then was attemping to access them from a .java class(in my example above calling .getYear() on it). Its a rookie mistake but the problem is once the object leaves a Groovy file it is simply treated as a Object. Thanks for all your help!

Best Answer

Per se, there is not much difference between those two statements; but since Groovy is a dynamic language, you can write

def name = "Stephanie"
println name.toUpperCase() // no cast required

while you would need an explicit cast in the Java version

Object name = "Stephanie";
System.out.println(((String) name).toUpperCase());

For that reason, def makes much more sense in Groovy than unfounded use of Object in Java.

Related Solutions

Java – What are the differences between a HashMap and a Hashtable in Java

There are several differences between HashMap and Hashtable in Java:

Hashtable is synchronized, whereas HashMap is not. This makes HashMap better for non-threaded applications, as unsynchronized Objects typically perform better than synchronized ones.
Hashtable does not allow null keys or values. HashMap allows one null key and any number of null values.
One of HashMap's subclasses is LinkedHashMap, so in the event that you'd want predictable iteration order (which is insertion order by default), you could easily swap out the HashMap for a LinkedHashMap. This wouldn't be as easy if you were using Hashtable.

Since synchronization is not an issue for you, I'd recommend HashMap. If synchronization becomes an issue, you may also look at ConcurrentHashMap.

Java inner class and static nested class

From the Java Tutorial:

Nested classes are divided into two categories: static and non-static. Nested classes that are declared static are simply called static nested classes. Non-static nested classes are called inner classes.

Static nested classes are accessed using the enclosing class name:

OuterClass.StaticNestedClass

For example, to create an object for the static nested class, use this syntax:

OuterClass.StaticNestedClass nestedObject = new OuterClass.StaticNestedClass();

Objects that are instances of an inner class exist within an instance of the outer class. Consider the following classes:

class OuterClass {
    ...
    class InnerClass {
        ...
    }
}

An instance of InnerClass can exist only within an instance of OuterClass and has direct access to the methods and fields of its enclosing instance.

To instantiate an inner class, you must first instantiate the outer class. Then, create the inner object within the outer object with this syntax:

OuterClass outerObject = new OuterClass()
OuterClass.InnerClass innerObject = outerObject.new InnerClass();

see: Java Tutorial - Nested Classes

For completeness note that there is also such a thing as an inner class without an enclosing instance:

class A {
  int t() { return 1; }
  static A a =  new A() { int t() { return 2; } };
}

Here, new A() { ... } is an inner class defined in a static context and does not have an enclosing instance.

Best Answer

Related Solutions

Java – What are the differences between a HashMap and a Hashtable in Java

Java inner class and static nested class

Related Topic