Arkde, I have a possible explanation why Jaroslav's solution with JDK7 didn't work for you.
Maybe you had mixed Java versions in various alternatives items, possibly conflicting with the version that environment variables like JAVA_HOME and JDK_HOME point to?
Maybe something points to the /usr/lib/jvm/default-java symlink as the JDK home, and that symlink points to a different version of JDK than intended?
Did you try resetting alternatives for all Java tools to version 7? Like this:
update-java-alternatives --list
# ...see what JDK's are available, choose the one that corresponds to Java 7
# and set it to be the default in alternatives:
sudo update-java-alternatives --set java-1.7.0-openjdk-amd64
# or interactively:
sudo update-alternatives --config java
What do the following commands output on your system?
echo $JAVA_HOME
echo $JDK_HOME
ls -l /usr/lib/jvm/default-java
update-java-alternatives --list
update-alternatives --list java
I had exactly the same problem.
I've performed strace on the Idea process and in the log I saw it trying to open several .class files without the path to them specified - like open("SomeClass.class", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) - no path to the project output directory and to appropriate package.
So I've apt-get installed JDK 7 along JDK 6:
apt-get install openjdk-7-doc openjdk-7-jdk openjdk-7-jre openjdk-7-jre-headless openjdk-7-jre-lib openjdk-7-source
In Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric, OpenJDK 6 isn't removable if you want OpenJDK 7. JDK 7 is dependent on JDK 6...
So I've:
- updated alternatives configuration as specified above,
- changed the
/usr/lib/jvm/default-java symlink to point to java-7-openjdk-amd64 ,
- double checked all the environment variables (my
JAVA_HOME and JDK_HOME both point to /usr/lib/jvm/default-java),
- reconfigured my project's SDK appropriately (and for all the modules in the project),
and voila - problem solved!
This is happening because ListView is a Naming Container. You can get around this in a couple of ways, but they all boil down to the choice of:
- Rendering the HTML you want.
- Pulling out the checked items in a different way.
The former is doable, but you'll likely loose a lot of ASP.NET's built in functionality. I'd advise against it unless you're deeply familiar with the control life cycle.
You've got everything you need for the pulling the values out in a way ASP is expecting:
HtmlInputCheckBox _CheckBoxDelete = (HtmlInputCheckBox)item.FindControl("CheckBoxDelete");
You just need to wait for the control hierarchy to be populated, and then loop over the ListView.Items looking for the checkboxes. Your "Delete" button's event handler is probably a good place to call this from.
Incidentally, why are you using a HtmlInputCheckbox, rather than a CheckBox?
Best Answer
On a 64bit openSuse 64 42.1 box;
provided;
But;
is the path that worked and allowed java emulator to run.
So i think we have to manually browse our file system and see what path to choose.