Java – Spring redirect request mapping

javaspringspring-mvc

I want to redirect my controller methods, so that I can submit a form with one url and then display a default url in browser, somethign like this do I need to change the return type postForms, create a new model and view/redirectview :

@RequestMapping(value = "/Home", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public String getHome( Model model){
  //view name append with .jsp
  return "myHome"; 
}

@RequestMapping(value = "/FormA", method = RequestMethod.POST)
public String postFormA(Email Email, Model model){
  //do stuff then
  //redirect to different requestMapping broswer url "/Home"
  getHome()    
}

@RequestMapping(value = "/FormB", method = RequestMethod.POST)
public String postFormB( Model model){
  //do stuff then
  //redirect to different requestMapping and display in broswer url "/Home"
  getHome()
}

Best Answer

How about something like this:

@RequestMapping(value = "/Home", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public ModelAndView getHome(){
  //view name append with .jsp
  return new ModelAndView("myHome"); 
}

@RequestMapping(value = "/FormA", method = RequestMethod.POST)
public String postFormA(Email Email, Model model){
  //do stuff then
  //redirect to different requestMapping broswer url "/Home"
  return "redirect:/Home";
}

@RequestMapping(value = "/FormB", method = RequestMethod.POST)
public String postFormB( Model model){
  //do stuff then
  //redirect to different requestMapping and display in broswer url "/Home"
  return "redirect:/Home";
}

Related Solutions

Java – How does autowiring work in Spring

First, and most important - all Spring beans are managed - they "live" inside a container, called "application context".

Second, each application has an entry point to that context. Web applications have a Servlet, JSF uses a el-resolver, etc. Also, there is a place where the application context is bootstrapped and all beans - autowired. In web applications this can be a startup listener.

Autowiring happens by placing an instance of one bean into the desired field in an instance of another bean. Both classes should be beans, i.e. they should be defined to live in the application context.

What is "living" in the application context? This means that the context instantiates the objects, not you. I.e. - you never make new UserServiceImpl() - the container finds each injection point and sets an instance there.

In your controllers, you just have the following:

@Controller // Defines that this class is a spring bean
@RequestMapping("/users")
public class SomeController {

    // Tells the application context to inject an instance of UserService here
    @Autowired
    private UserService userService;

    @RequestMapping("/login")
    public void login(@RequestParam("username") String username,
           @RequestParam("password") String password) {

        // The UserServiceImpl is already injected and you can use it
        userService.login(username, password);

    }
}

A few notes:

In your applicationContext.xml you should enable the <context:component-scan> so that classes are scanned for the @Controller, @Service, etc. annotations.
The entry point for a Spring-MVC application is the DispatcherServlet, but it is hidden from you, and hence the direct interaction and bootstrapping of the application context happens behind the scene.
UserServiceImpl should also be defined as bean - either using <bean id=".." class=".."> or using the @Service annotation. Since it will be the only implementor of UserService, it will be injected.
Apart from the @Autowired annotation, Spring can use XML-configurable autowiring. In that case all fields that have a name or type that matches with an existing bean automatically get a bean injected. In fact, that was the initial idea of autowiring - to have fields injected with dependencies without any configuration. Other annotations like @Inject, @Resource can also be used.

Java – What’s the difference between @Component, @Repository & @Service annotations in Spring

From Spring Documentation:

The @Repository annotation is a marker for any class that fulfils the role or stereotype of a repository (also known as Data Access Object or DAO). Among the uses of this marker is the automatic translation of exceptions, as described in Exception Translation.

Spring provides further stereotype annotations: @Component, @Service, and @Controller. @Component is a generic stereotype for any Spring-managed component. @Repository, @Service, and @Controller are specializations of @Component for more specific use cases (in the persistence, service, and presentation layers, respectively). Therefore, you can annotate your component classes with @Component, but, by annotating them with @Repository, @Service, or @Controller instead, your classes are more properly suited for processing by tools or associating with aspects.

For example, these stereotype annotations make ideal targets for pointcuts. @Repository, @Service, and @Controller can also carry additional semantics in future releases of the Spring Framework. Thus, if you are choosing between using @Component or @Service for your service layer, @Service is clearly the better choice. Similarly, as stated earlier, @Repository is already supported as a marker for automatic exception translation in your persistence layer.

Annotation	Meaning
`@Component`	generic stereotype for any Spring-managed component
`@Repository`	stereotype for persistence layer
`@Service`	stereotype for service layer
`@Controller`	stereotype for presentation layer (spring-mvc)

Best Answer

Related Solutions

Java – How does autowiring work in Spring

Java – What’s the difference between @Component, @Repository & @Service annotations in Spring

Related Topic