The docs for java.io.Serializable
are probably about as good an explanation as you'll get:
The serialization runtime associates with each serializable class a version number, called a serialVersionUID
, which is used during deserialization to verify that the sender and receiver of a serialized object have loaded classes for that object that are compatible with respect to serialization. If the receiver has loaded a class for the object that has a different serialVersionUID
than that of the corresponding sender's class, then deserialization will result in an
InvalidClassException
. A serializable class can declare its own serialVersionUID
explicitly by declaring a field named serialVersionUID
that must be static, final, and of type long
:
ANY-ACCESS-MODIFIER static final long serialVersionUID = 42L;
If a serializable class does not explicitly declare a serialVersionUID
, then the serialization runtime will calculate a default serialVersionUID
value for that class based on various aspects of the class, as described in the Java(TM) Object Serialization Specification. However, it is strongly recommended that all serializable classes explicitly declare serialVersionUID
values, since the default serialVersionUID
computation is highly sensitive to class details that may vary depending on compiler implementations, and can thus result in unexpected InvalidClassExceptions
during deserialization. Therefore, to guarantee a consistent serialVersionUID
value across different java compiler implementations, a serializable class must declare an explicit serialVersionUID
value. It is also strongly advised that explicit serialVersionUID
declarations use the private modifier where possible, since such declarations apply only to the immediately declaring class — serialVersionUID
fields are not useful as inherited members.
The transient
keyword in Java is used to indicate that a field should not be part of the serialization (which means saved, like to a file) process.
From the Java Language Specification, Java SE 7 Edition, Section 8.3.1.3. transient
Fields:
Variables may be marked transient
to
indicate that they are not part of the
persistent state of an object.
For example, you may have fields that are derived from other fields, and should only be done so programmatically, rather than having the state be persisted via serialization.
Here's a GalleryImage
class which contains an image and a thumbnail derived from the image:
class GalleryImage implements Serializable
{
private Image image;
private transient Image thumbnailImage;
private void generateThumbnail()
{
// Generate thumbnail.
}
private void readObject(ObjectInputStream inputStream)
throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException
{
inputStream.defaultReadObject();
generateThumbnail();
}
}
In this example, the thumbnailImage
is a thumbnail image that is generated by invoking the generateThumbnail
method.
The thumbnailImage
field is marked as transient
, so only the original image
is serialized rather than persisting both the original image and the thumbnail image. This means that less storage would be needed to save the serialized object. (Of course, this may or may not be desirable depending on the requirements of the system -- this is just an example.)
At the time of deserialization, the readObject
method is called to perform any operations necessary to restore the state of the object back to the state at which the serialization occurred. Here, the thumbnail needs to be generated, so the readObject
method is overridden so that the thumbnail will be generated by calling the generateThumbnail
method.
For additional information, the article Discover the secrets of the Java Serialization API (which was originally available on the Sun Developer Network) has a section which discusses the use of and presents a scenario where the transient
keyword is used to prevent serialization of certain fields.
Best Answer
tl;dr 2016 Use RxJava and a PublishSubject to expose an Observable for the clicks.
Original Post:
Since the introduction of
ListView
,onItemClickListener
has been problematic. The moment you have a click listener for any of the internal elements the callback would not be triggered but it wasn't notified or well documented (if at all) so there was a lot of confusion and SO questions about it.Given that
RecyclerView
takes it a step further and doesn't have a concept of a row/column, but rather an arbitrarily laid out amount of children, they have delegated the onClick to each one of them, or to programmer implementation.Think of
Recyclerview
not as aListView
1:1 replacement but rather as a more flexible component for complex use cases. And as you say, your solution is what google expected of you. Now you have an adapter who can delegate onClick to an interface passed on the constructor, which is the correct pattern for bothListView
andRecyclerview
.and then on your adapter
Now look into that last piece of code:
onCreateViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType)
the signature already suggest different view types. For each one of them you'll require a different viewholder too, and subsequently each one of them can have a different set of clicks. Or you can just create a generic viewholder that takes any view and oneonClickListener
and applies accordingly. Or delegate up one level to the orchestrator so several fragments/activities have the same list with different click behaviour. Again, all flexibility is on your side.It is a really needed component and fairly close to what our internal implementations and improvements to
ListView
were until now. It's good that Google finally acknowledges it.