Most efficient way to determine if a Lua table is empty (contains no entries)

lualua-table

What's the most efficient way to determine if a table is empty (that is, currently contains neither array-style values nor dict-style values)?

Currently, I'm using next():

if not next(myTable) then
    -- Table is empty
end

Is there a more efficient way?

Note: The # operator does not suffice here, as it only operates on the array-style values in the table – thus #{test=2} is indistinguishable from #{} because both return 0. Also note that checking if the table variable is nil does not suffice as I am not looking for nil values, but rather tables with 0 entries (i.e. {}).

Best Answer

Your code is efficient but wrong. (Consider {[false]=0}.) The correct code is

if next(myTable) == nil then
   -- myTable is empty
end

For maximum efficiency you'll want to bind next to a local variable, e.g.,

...
local next = next 
...
... if next(...) ...

(When next is local, the code finds primitive function next by a constant-time indexing operation into an array of "upvalues." When next is left global, finding next involves indexing index the "environment" hash table, which contains the values of the global variables. This indexing operation is still constant-time, but it is significantly slower than the array lookup for a local variable.)

Related Solutions

How to copy a Lua table by value

Table copy has many potential definitions. It depends on whether you want simple or deep copy, whether you want to copy, share or ignore metatables, etc. There is no single implementation that could satisfy everybody.

One approach is to simply create a new table and duplicate all key/value pairs:

function table.shallow_copy(t)
  local t2 = {}
  for k,v in pairs(t) do
    t2[k] = v
  end
  return t2
end

copy = table.shallow_copy(a)

Note that you should use pairs instead of ipairs, since ipairs only iterate over a subset of the table keys (ie. consecutive positive integer keys starting at one in increasing order).

How to remove a lua table entry by its key

No, setting the key's value to nil is the accepted way of removing an item in the hashmap portion of a table. What you're doing is standard. However, I'd recommend not overriding table.remove() - for the array portion of a table, the default table.remove() functionality includes renumbering the indices, which your override would not do. If you do want to add your function to the table function set, then I'd probably name it something like table.removekey() or some such.

Best Answer

Related Solutions

How to copy a Lua table by value

How to remove a lua table entry by its key

Related Topic