Castle Windsor is an inversion of control tool. There are others like it.
It can give you objects with pre-built and pre-wired dependencies right in there. An entire object graph created via reflection and configuration rather than the "new" operator.
Start here: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/altdotnet/message/10434
Imagine you have an email sending class. EmailSender. Imagine you have another class WorkflowStepper. Inside WorkflowStepper you need to use EmailSender.
You could always say new EmailSender().Send(emailMessage);
but that - the use of new
- creates a TIGHT COUPLING that is hard to change. (this is a tiny contrived example after all)
So what if, instead of newing this bad boy up inside WorkflowStepper, you just passed it into the constructor?
So then whoever called it had to new up the EmailSender.
new WorkflowStepper(emailSender).Step()
Imagine you have hundreds of these little classes that only have one responsibility (google SRP).. and you use a few of them in WorkflowStepper:
new WorkflowStepper(emailSender, alertRegistry, databaseConnection).Step()
Imagine not worrying about the details of EmailSender
when you are writing WorkflowStepper
or AlertRegistry
You just worry about the concern you are working with.
Imagine this whole graph (tree) of objects and dependencies gets wired up at RUN TIME, so that when you do this:
WorkflowStepper stepper = Container.Get<WorkflowStepper>();
you get a real deal WorkflowStepper
with all the dependencies automatically filled in where you need them.
There is no new
It just happens - because it knows what needs what.
And you can write fewer defects with better designed, DRY code in a testable and repeatable way.
C# language version history:
These are the versions of C# known about at the time of this writing:
- C# 1.0 released with .NET 1.0 and VS2002 (January 2002)
- C# 1.2 (bizarrely enough); released with .NET 1.1 and VS2003 (April 2003). First version to call
Dispose
on IEnumerator
s which implemented IDisposable
. A few other small features.
- C# 2.0 released with .NET 2.0 and VS2005 (November 2005). Major new features: generics, anonymous methods, nullable types, and iterator blocks
- C# 3.0 released with .NET 3.5 and VS2008 (November 2007). Major new features: lambda expressions, extension methods, expression trees, anonymous types, implicit typing (
var
), and query expressions
- C# 4.0 released with .NET 4 and VS2010 (April 2010). Major new features: late binding (
dynamic
), delegate and interface generic variance, more COM support, named arguments, tuple data type and optional parameters
- C# 5.0 released with .NET 4.5 and VS2012 (August 2012). Major features: async programming, and caller info attributes. Breaking change: loop variable closure.
- C# 6.0 released with .NET 4.6 and VS2015 (July 2015). Implemented by Roslyn. Features: initializers for automatically implemented properties, using directives to import static members, exception filters, element initializers,
await
in catch
and finally
, extension Add
methods in collection initializers.
- C# 7.0 released with .NET 4.7 and VS2017 (March 2017). Major new features: tuples, ref locals and ref return, pattern matching (including pattern-based switch statements), inline
out
parameter declarations, local functions, binary literals, digit separators, and arbitrary async returns.
- C# 7.1 released with VS2017 v15.3 (August 2017). New features: async main, tuple member name inference, default expression, and pattern matching with generics.
- C# 7.2 released with VS2017 v15.5 (November 2017). New features: private protected access modifier, Span<T>, aka interior pointer, aka stackonly struct, and everything else.
- C# 7.3 released with VS2017 v15.7 (May 2018). New features: enum, delegate and
unmanaged
generic type constraints. ref
reassignment. Unsafe improvements: stackalloc
initialization, unpinned indexed fixed
buffers, custom fixed
statements. Improved overloading resolution. Expression variables in initializers and queries. ==
and !=
defined for tuples. Auto-properties' backing fields can now be targeted by attributes.
- C# 8.0 released with .NET Core 3.0 and VS2019 v16.3 (September 2019). Major new features: nullable reference-types, asynchronous streams, indices and ranges, readonly members, using declarations, default interface methods, static local functions, and enhancement of interpolated verbatim strings.
- C# 9.0 released with .NET 5.0 and VS2019 v16.8 (November 2020). Major new features: init-only properties, records, with-expressions, data classes, positional records, top-level programs, improved pattern matching (simple type patterns, relational patterns, logical patterns), improved target typing (target-type
new
expressions, target typed ??
and ?
), and covariant returns. Minor features: relax ordering of ref
and partial
modifiers, parameter null checking, lambda discard parameters, native int
s, attributes on local functions, function pointers, static lambdas, extension GetEnumerator
, module initializers, and extending partial.
In response to the OP's question:
What are the correct version numbers for C#? What came out when? Why can't I find any answers about C# 3.5?
There is no such thing as C# 3.5 - the cause of confusion here is that the C# 3.0 is present in .NET 3.5. The language and framework are versioned independently, however - as is the CLR, which is at version 2.0 for .NET 2.0 through 3.5, .NET 4 introducing CLR 4.0, service packs notwithstanding. The CLR in .NET 4.5 has various improvements, but the versioning is unclear: in some places it may be referred to as CLR 4.5 (this MSDN page used to refer to it that way, for example), but the Environment.Version
property still reports 4.0.xxx.
As of May 3, 2017, the C# Language Team created a history of C# versions and features on their GitHub repository: Features Added in C# Language Versions. There is also a page that tracks upcoming and recently implemented language features.
Best Answer
To answer your questions:
You also can have class components, but they have limitations, and you must be aware of those (for example you can't intercept calls to non-virtual methods). I have found Windsor to be the most mature, and best suited to my style of development container of all.
Other than that, Performance, I haven't heard of a project that had to discard dependency container because of unacceptable performance. Windsor is really smart about it, and it caches the results of lengthy operations so that you don't have to pay the price twice. You may find charts on the Internet, comparing speed of many IoC containers. Two things to note about those: All containers are really fast. Don't think that the fact that other containers are faster on these charts than Windsor, means that they are better. Windsor does a lot of stuff for you that other containers don't.