Windows – How to build OpenSSL statically linked against Windows runtime

copensslstatic-librariesstatic-linkingwindows

I'm working on a C++ application for Windows that uses OpenSSL 1.0.1e library. I'm on Visual Studio 2008.

For portability reasons my application is statically linked against runtime libraries (/MT and /MTd options). And I don't ship runtime libs with my application.

Per the OpenSSL FAQ, the library is by default linked against multithreaded DLL runtime (/MDd) which is obviously incompatible with my scenario. So to make my program work I've added applink.c to my project. On my dev machine and on most test computers the program works fine.

But unfortunately I've located computers where the app doesn't start. Windows displays error:

The application failed to initialize properly (0xc0150002). Click on OK to
terminate the application.

I've opened libeay32.dll in Dependency Walker and I see that MSVCR90.dll is not found. So the trick with applink.c doesn't really work for me.

How do I build OpenSSL with /MT or /MTd option?

Best Answer

Use the nt.mak makefile rather than the ntdll.mak makefile.

As an aside, I have written some scripts around the standard OpenSSL build scripts which make it 'easier' (for me at least) to use OpenSSL on Windows with a mix of both x86 and x64, you can get them from here.

Related Solutions

Ios – How to develop for iPhone using a Windows development machine

It's certainly possible to develop on a Windows machine, in fact, my first application was exclusively developed on the old Dell Precision I had at the time :)

There are three routes;

Install OSx86 (aka iATKOS / Kalyway) on a second partition/disk and dual boot.
Run Mac OS X Server under VMWare (Mac OS X 10.7 (Lion) onwards, read the update below).
Use Delphi XE4 and the macincloud service. This is a commercial toolset, but the component and lib support is growing.

The first route requires modifying (or using a pre-modified) image of Leopard that can be installed on a regular PC. This is not as hard as you would think, although your success/effort ratio will depend upon how closely the hardware in your PC matches that in Mac hardware - e.g. if you're running a Core 2 Duo on an Intel Motherboard, with an NVidia graphics card you are laughing. If you're running an AMD machine or something without SSE3 it gets a little more involved.

If you purchase (or already own) a version of Leopard then this is a gray area since the Leopard EULA states you may only run it on an "Apple Labeled" machine. As many point out if you stick an Apple sticker on your PC you're probably covered.

The second option is more costly. The EULA for the workstation version of Leopard prevents it from being run under emulation and as a result, there's no support in VMWare for this. Leopard server, however, CAN be run under emulation and can be used for desktop purposes. Leopard server and VMWare are expensive, however.

If you're interested in option 1) I would suggest starting at Insanelymac and reading the OSx86 sections.

I do think you should consider whether the time you will invest is going to be worth the money you will save though. It was for me because I enjoy tinkering with this type of stuff and I started during the early iPhone betas, months before their App Store became available.

Alternatively, you could pick up a low-spec Mac Mini from eBay. You don't need much horsepower to run the SDK and you can always sell it on later if you decide to stop development or buy a better Mac.

Update: You cannot create a Mac OS X Client virtual machine for OS X 10.6 and earlier. Apple does not allow these Client OSes to be virtualized. With Mac OS X 10.7 (Lion) onwards, Apple has changed its licensing agreement in regards to virtualization. Source: VMWare KnowledgeBase

Windows – How to you find out which process is listening on a TCP or UDP port on Windows

New answer, powershell

TCP

Get-Process -Id (Get-NetTCPConnection -LocalPort YourPortNumberHere).OwningProcess

UDP

Get-Process -Id (Get-NetUDPEndpoint -LocalPort YourPortNumberHere).OwningProcess

Old answer, cmd

 C:\> netstat -a -b

(Add -n to stop it trying to resolve hostnames, which will make it a lot faster.)

Note Dane's recommendation for TCPView. It looks very useful!

-a Displays all connections and listening ports.

-b Displays the executable involved in creating each connection or listening port. In some cases well-known executables host multiple independent components, and in these cases the sequence of components involved in creating the connection or listening port is displayed. In this case the executable name is in [] at the bottom, on top is the component it called, and so forth until TCP/IP was reached. Note that this option can be time-consuming and will fail unless you have sufficient permissions.

-n Displays addresses and port numbers in numerical form.

-o Displays the owning process ID associated with each connection.