ggplot2plotrr-faq
I would like to plot y1 and y2 in the same plot.
x <- seq(-2, 2, 0.05)
y1 <- pnorm(x)
y2 <- pnorm(x, 1, 1)
plot(x, y1, type = "l", col = "red")
plot(x, y2, type = "l", col = "green")
But when I do it like this, they are not plotted in the same plot together.
In Matlab one can do hold on, but does anyone know how to do this in R?
R has many *apply functions which are ably described in the help files (e.g. ?apply). There are enough of them, though, that beginning useRs may have difficulty deciding which one is appropriate for their situation or even remembering them all. They may have a general sense that "I should be using an *apply function here", but it can be tough to keep them all straight at first.
Despite the fact (noted in other answers) that much of the functionality of the *apply family is covered by the extremely popular plyr package, the base functions remain useful and worth knowing.
This answer is intended to act as a sort of signpost for new useRs to help direct them to the correct *apply function for their particular problem. Note, this is not intended to simply regurgitate or replace the R documentation! The hope is that this answer helps you to decide which *apply function suits your situation and then it is up to you to research it further. With one exception, performance differences will not be addressed.
apply - When you want to apply a function to the rows or columns of a matrix (and higher-dimensional analogues); not generally advisable for data frames as it will coerce to a matrix first.
# Two dimensional matrix
M <- matrix(seq(1,16), 4, 4)
# apply min to rows
apply(M, 1, min)
[1] 1 2 3 4
# apply max to columns
apply(M, 2, max)
[1] 4 8 12 16
# 3 dimensional array
M <- array( seq(32), dim = c(4,4,2))
# Apply sum across each M[*, , ] - i.e Sum across 2nd and 3rd dimension
apply(M, 1, sum)
# Result is one-dimensional
[1] 120 128 136 144
# Apply sum across each M[*, *, ] - i.e Sum across 3rd dimension
apply(M, c(1,2), sum)
# Result is two-dimensional
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4]
[1,] 18 26 34 42
[2,] 20 28 36 44
[3,] 22 30 38 46
[4,] 24 32 40 48
If you want row/column means or sums for a 2D matrix, be sure to
investigate the highly optimized, lightning-quick colMeans,
rowMeans, colSums, rowSums.
lapply - When you want to apply a function to each element of a list in turn and get a list back.
This is the workhorse of many of the other *apply functions. Peel
back their code and you will often find lapply underneath.
x <- list(a = 1, b = 1:3, c = 10:100)
lapply(x, FUN = length)
$a
[1] 1
$b
[1] 3
$c
[1] 91
lapply(x, FUN = sum)
$a
[1] 1
$b
[1] 6
$c
[1] 5005
sapply - When you want to apply a function to each element of a list in turn, but you want a vector back, rather than a list.
If you find yourself typing unlist(lapply(...)), stop and consider
sapply.
x <- list(a = 1, b = 1:3, c = 10:100)
# Compare with above; a named vector, not a list
sapply(x, FUN = length)
a b c
1 3 91
sapply(x, FUN = sum)
a b c
1 6 5005
In more advanced uses of sapply it will attempt to coerce the
result to a multi-dimensional array, if appropriate. For example, if our function returns vectors of the same length, sapply will use them as columns of a matrix:
sapply(1:5,function(x) rnorm(3,x))
If our function returns a 2 dimensional matrix, sapply will do essentially the same thing, treating each returned matrix as a single long vector:
sapply(1:5,function(x) matrix(x,2,2))
Unless we specify simplify = "array", in which case it will use the individual matrices to build a multi-dimensional array:
sapply(1:5,function(x) matrix(x,2,2), simplify = "array")
Each of these behaviors is of course contingent on our function returning vectors or matrices of the same length or dimension.
vapply - When you want to use sapply but perhaps need to
squeeze some more speed out of your code or want more type safety.
For vapply, you basically give R an example of what sort of thing
your function will return, which can save some time coercing returned
values to fit in a single atomic vector.
x <- list(a = 1, b = 1:3, c = 10:100)
#Note that since the advantage here is mainly speed, this
# example is only for illustration. We're telling R that
# everything returned by length() should be an integer of
# length 1.
vapply(x, FUN = length, FUN.VALUE = 0L)
a b c
1 3 91
mapply - For when you have several data structures (e.g.
vectors, lists) and you want to apply a function to the 1st elements
of each, and then the 2nd elements of each, etc., coercing the result
to a vector/array as in sapply.
This is multivariate in the sense that your function must accept multiple arguments.
#Sums the 1st elements, the 2nd elements, etc.
mapply(sum, 1:5, 1:5, 1:5)
[1] 3 6 9 12 15
#To do rep(1,4), rep(2,3), etc.
mapply(rep, 1:4, 4:1)
[[1]]
[1] 1 1 1 1
[[2]]
[1] 2 2 2
[[3]]
[1] 3 3
[[4]]
[1] 4
Map - A wrapper to mapply with SIMPLIFY = FALSE, so it is guaranteed to return a list.
Map(sum, 1:5, 1:5, 1:5)
[[1]]
[1] 3
[[2]]
[1] 6
[[3]]
[1] 9
[[4]]
[1] 12
[[5]]
[1] 15
rapply - For when you want to apply a function to each element of a nested list structure, recursively.
To give you some idea of how uncommon rapply is, I forgot about it when first posting this answer! Obviously, I'm sure many people use it, but YMMV. rapply is best illustrated with a user-defined function to apply:
# Append ! to string, otherwise increment
myFun <- function(x){
if(is.character(x)){
return(paste(x,"!",sep=""))
}
else{
return(x + 1)
}
}
#A nested list structure
l <- list(a = list(a1 = "Boo", b1 = 2, c1 = "Eeek"),
b = 3, c = "Yikes",
d = list(a2 = 1, b2 = list(a3 = "Hey", b3 = 5)))
# Result is named vector, coerced to character
rapply(l, myFun)
# Result is a nested list like l, with values altered
rapply(l, myFun, how="replace")
tapply - For when you want to apply a function to subsets of a vector and the subsets are defined by some other vector, usually a factor.
The black sheep of the *apply family, of sorts. The help file's use of the phrase "ragged array" can be a bit confusing, but it is actually quite simple.
A vector:
x <- 1:20
A factor (of the same length!) defining groups:
y <- factor(rep(letters[1:5], each = 4))
Add up the values in x within each subgroup defined by y:
tapply(x, y, sum)
a b c d e
10 26 42 58 74
More complex examples can be handled where the subgroups are defined
by the unique combinations of a list of several factors. tapply is
similar in spirit to the split-apply-combine functions that are
common in R (aggregate, by, ave, ddply, etc.) Hence its
black sheep status.
Here is an even simpler solution using base graphics and alpha-blending (which does not work on all graphics devices):
set.seed(42)
p1 <- hist(rnorm(500,4)) # centered at 4
p2 <- hist(rnorm(500,6)) # centered at 6
plot( p1, col=rgb(0,0,1,1/4), xlim=c(0,10)) # first histogram
plot( p2, col=rgb(1,0,0,1/4), xlim=c(0,10), add=T) # second
The key is that the colours are semi-transparent.
Edit, more than two years later: As this just got an upvote, I figure I may as well add a visual of what the code produces as alpha-blending is so darn useful:
Best Answer
lines()orpoints()will add to the existing graph, but will not create a new window. So you'd need to do