Sql-server – What are the main performance differences between varchar and nvarchar SQL Server data types

nvarcharsql serversql-server-2005storagevarchar

I'm working on a database for a small web app at my school using SQL Server 2005.
I see a couple of schools of thought on the issue of varchar vs nvarchar:

  1. Use varchar unless you deal with a lot of internationalized data, then use nvarchar.
  2. Just use nvarchar for everything.

I'm beginning to see the merits of view 2. I know that nvarchar does take up twice as much space, but that isn't necessarily a huge deal since this is only going to store data for a few hundred students. To me it seems like it would be easiest not to worry about it and just allow everything to use nvarchar. Or is there something I'm missing?

Best Answer

Disk space is not the issue... but memory and performance will be. Double the page reads, double index size, strange LIKE and = constant behaviour etc

Do you need to store Chinese etc script? Yes or no...

And from MS BOL "Storage and Performance Effects of Unicode"

Edit:

Recent SO question highlighting how bad nvarchar performance can be...

SQL Server uses high CPU when searching inside nvarchar strings

Related Topic