You can use Convert.ToHexString
starting with .NET 5.
There's also a method for the reverse operation: Convert.FromHexString
.
For older versions of .NET you can either use:
public static string ByteArrayToString(byte[] ba)
{
StringBuilder hex = new StringBuilder(ba.Length * 2);
foreach (byte b in ba)
hex.AppendFormat("{0:x2}", b);
return hex.ToString();
}
or:
public static string ByteArrayToString(byte[] ba)
{
return BitConverter.ToString(ba).Replace("-","");
}
There are even more variants of doing it, for example here.
The reverse conversion would go like this:
public static byte[] StringToByteArray(String hex)
{
int NumberChars = hex.Length;
byte[] bytes = new byte[NumberChars / 2];
for (int i = 0; i < NumberChars; i += 2)
bytes[i / 2] = Convert.ToByte(hex.Substring(i, 2), 16);
return bytes;
}
Using Substring
is the best option in combination with Convert.ToByte
. See this answer for more information. If you need better performance, you must avoid Convert.ToByte
before you can drop SubString
.
You can either use array declaration or array literal (but only when you declare and affect the variable right away, array literals cannot be used for re-assigning an array).
For primitive types:
int[] myIntArray = new int[3];
int[] myIntArray = {1, 2, 3};
int[] myIntArray = new int[]{1, 2, 3};
// Since Java 8. Doc of IntStream: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/stream/IntStream.html
int [] myIntArray = IntStream.range(0, 100).toArray(); // From 0 to 99
int [] myIntArray = IntStream.rangeClosed(0, 100).toArray(); // From 0 to 100
int [] myIntArray = IntStream.of(12,25,36,85,28,96,47).toArray(); // The order is preserved.
int [] myIntArray = IntStream.of(12,25,36,85,28,96,47).sorted().toArray(); // Sort
For classes, for example String
, it's the same:
String[] myStringArray = new String[3];
String[] myStringArray = {"a", "b", "c"};
String[] myStringArray = new String[]{"a", "b", "c"};
The third way of initializing is useful when you declare an array first and then initialize it, pass an array as a function argument, or return an array. The explicit type is required.
String[] myStringArray;
myStringArray = new String[]{"a", "b", "c"};
Best Answer
I figured it out. The problem is that the
=>
for a function type literal is itself merely syntactic sugar and doesn't want to compose with[]
.As the spec says:
So what I want is:
Complete example:
Update:
Judging from this changeset parentheses will be allowed in type declarations in 1.4, so the "first guess" in the question will also be correct:
Further Update It is in 1.4!