Solving ckt#3 the hard way using differential equations:
To start with, this equations always holds, for any capacitor
$$i = CdV/dt$$
In the circuit you've provided, we have two unknown voltages (V1 across C1 and V2 across C2). These can be solved by applying Kirchoff's Current Laws on the two nodes.
For node V1:
$$
(V_s-V_1)/R_1 = C_1 dV_1/dt + (V_1-V_2)/R_2
$$
And for node V2:
$$
(V_1-V_2)/R_2 = C_2 dV_2/dt
$$
Now we've got two differential equations in two unknowns. Solving the two simultaneously give us the expressions for V1 and V2. Once V1 and V2 are calculated, calculating the currents through the branches is trivial.
Solving differential equations is, of course, not trivial. What we generally do is to use Laplace Transform or Fourier Transform to convert them into algebraic equations in the frequency domain, solve the unknowns, and then do Inverse Laplace/Fourier transform to get the unknowns back into time domain.
Method 2: Use voltage divider rule:
If we recall that the impedance across a capacitor C is $$Z=1/jwC$$ and denoting the impedances of the two capacitors C1 and C2 as Z1 and Z2, we can calculate V2 using the formula for voltage division across two impedances (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage_divider): $$V_2 = V_1 R_2/(R_2 + Z_2)$$
V1 can also be calculated using the same rule, the only issue is that the impedance on the right side of node 1 is a bit complex: it's the parallel combination of Z1 and (R2 + Z2). V1 now becomes $$V_1 = V_s (Z_1*(R_2+Z_2)/(Z_1+R_2+Z_2))/(R_1 + (Z_1*(R_2+Z_2)/(Z_1+R_2+Z_2)))$$
What to do next is to expand Z1 and Z2 using the capacitive-impedance formula, to get V1 and V2 in terms of w. If you need the complete time response of the variables, you can do Inverse Fourier Transforms and get V1 and V2 as functions of time. If however, you just the need the final (steady-state) value, you can set $$w=0$$ and evaluate V1 and V2.
A rather simpler way:
This method can give only the final steady-state values, but it's a bit handy for quick calculations. The catch is that once a circuit has settled into a steady state, the current through every capacitor will be zero. Take the first circuit (the simple RC) for example. The fact that the current through C is zero dictates the current through R (and hence the voltage drop across it) also to be zero. Hence, the voltage across C will be equal to Vs.
For the second circuit, all the current must pass through the path R1->R2->R3 if the capacitor draws no current. This means the voltage across C (equal to the voltage across R2) is $$V_s R_2 / (R_1 + R_2 + R_3)$$
In the last circuit, current through C2 being equal to zero implies the current through R2 being zero (and hence any voltage drop across it). This means any current that flows must take the path R1->C1. However, the current through C1 is also zero, which means R1 also carries no current. So both the voltages V1 and V2 will be equal to Vs in steady state.
The systematic way to solve these kind of problems is nodal analysis (on which computer simulation programs are based ). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nodal_analysis
For each node you write down the equation that the sum of currents is zero. The voltages (with respect to a choosen ground) are the unknowns.
Note that the voltage sources need to be converted to current sources. If that is not possible (as in your case), the voltage between two nodes is known and one voltage can be eliminated.
In any case this will give you an equation system for the voltages, which can be solved. So this solves the circuit in more or less one step without superposition.
It is also a systematic way, which requires (once understood) no thinking at all (well, correct calculation though).
Best Answer
Here is one approach: Temporarily remove the capacitor from the circuit. Consider where the capacitor went the "output", and reduce the circuit to a Thevenin source. Now you have a single voltage source with a single resistor in series with it driving a capacitance. You should be able to calculate the voltage across the capacitor from there.
Remember that Ohm's law also works with capacitors, but that then the resistance is a complex impedance instead. Note that when the resistance is actually just a resistor, it has no imaginary component and you get the traditional Ohm's law for resistors. One way to think of that is that the "real" Ohm's law is for complex impedances, but the common version for resistance is just a special case where all the values are real.