Electronic – Adding a gap to a core for an inductor

1. N87 is straight-up ferrite material, not distributed air gap like powder iron types of material. Just because it's in toroidal form doesn't mean it's distributed-gap material - N87 in a toroid will saturate the same way as N87 in an E-core. There's nothing wrong with using straight-up ferrite for a boost inductor, so long as you gap it (more on this later). The fact that it's in toroidal form means you can't gap it. You might want to switch to Kool-Mu if you want to stick with a toroidal form factor.

2. Deriving the core inductance from the \$A_L\$ factor is reasonably good, so long as you have sufficient turns on the core and can keep the winding reasonably uniform and in as few layers as possible. Bear in mind that \$A_L\$ can vary by +/- 25% on some cores.

3. Boost inductors carry both the magnetizing current and energy for the load (that will be stored magnetically and delivered during the off-time.) Once the converter starts operating in continuous conduction mode (when the inductor current never goes to zero), it's even worse since you start operating on a B-H curve that doesn't reset to zero. (Bmax is still Bmax, but you now have a DC offset on which Bpeak is riding.) These are the reasons that the inductor needs air gapping - the core won't be able to handle any significant DC current without saturation otherwise.

4. I'm not sure I understand your test circuit. Both ends of the inductor are essentially clamped to 5V, meaning that the two capacitors (C1 and C2) contribute nothing to the simulation. If your real boost converter is arranged in this manner, it isn't a boost converter and will never work. L1 needs to release its stored energy through D1 to the load, which can never happen when D1 and the load is connected as shown. The only connection between input and output must be through L1 and D1. I would also put R1 in the source of Q1 and do a single ground-referenced measurement instead of a mathematical construction. (L1 will only saturate when Q1 is on, so measuring it when Q1 is off is irrelevant.)

Lets start with a few basics here

$$V = N \dfrac{d}{dt} \Phi = N \cdot A_e \dfrac{d}{dt}B$$

Here \$ B \$ is flux density and for a typical ferrite running at 20kHz I would personally be designing for a flux density swing of around \$200 \text{ mT}\$

Assuming the input voltage is is 27 volts peak to peak maximum, 50% duty cycle @ 20kHz \$ dt = 25 \mu s\$

We now know everything except \$A_e\$ and \$N\$ so we can rearrange the above equation to find \$ N \cdot A_e\$

$$N \cdot A_e = \dfrac{V \cdot dt}{dB} = \dfrac{27 \cdot 25 \times 10^{-6}}{0.2} = 3.38 \times 10^{-3}$$

Note that this product is using Area in SI units (\$m^2\$) and the data sheet probably gives \$A_e\$ in \$\text{mm}^2\$ so we want \$3380000\text{mm}^2\$

In theory any combination of \$N \cdot A_e\$ will work but we note the more turns we have the more area is needed for the windings and the size of the wire we need is set by the current it needs to carry. A typical figure for wire size is to assume a maximum current density of \$ J= 4.5 \cdot \dfrac{\text{amp}}{\text{mm}^2}\$

Given our current of 7.5 amps this requires a wire diameter of \$ \sqrt{\dfrac{4 \cdot I}{J \cdot \pi}}\approx 1.5\text{mm}\$

So we can have a core with a lot of turns and small \$A_e\$ or few turns and big \$A_e\$ the most economic design will be the smallest core into which the turns will fit and if we assume that the wire packs poorly the area required for a single turn is \$A_t = (1.5 \text{mm})^2 = 2.25 \text{mm}^2\$

We can thus work out the area required for the winding \$ A_w = N \cdot A_t \Rightarrow N = \dfrac{A_w}{A_t}\$

Substituting this into the equation above

$$N \cdot A_e = \dfrac{A_w \cdot A_e}{A_t}=\dfrac{V \cdot dt}{dB} \Rightarrow A_w \cdot A_e = \dfrac{A_t\cdot V \cdot dt}{dB} = 7605000 \text{mm}^4$$

Where \$A_e\$ is the core effective area and \$A_w\$ is the available winding area taking into account the bobbin.

Now the coil you have designed will have much more inductance than you want so you will need to introduce an air gap. I usually don't try to calculate this but ask my winding house to gap the core, in the center leg to give me the inductance I want.

The boost converter can be designed in a similar way but I'd ask further advice as at such high frequencies skin and proximity effects are significant.