Our turbine has a permanent magnet synchronous generator and full converter system (rectifier diods for rectification and IGBTs for chopping dc link voltage and as inverters) which means its generator doesnt need excitation current to start. Then why does it draw reactive power whenever turbine is in stop mode due to no wind or if it is manually stopped? What is purpose of this reactive power? I have been searching for this for over a month now but could not find any answer.
Electronic – Why does a turbine with PMSG and full converter system draws reactive power when turbine is stopped or there is no wind
electricalpower electronicspower-generation
Related Solutions
The main reason for reactive power compensation is to regulate the voltage magnitude. Note that the compensation might be both positive and negative (reactive power in, or reactive power out). In a transmission system, there is a strong correlation between reactive power and voltage magnitude, whereas the active power is mainly dependent on the voltage angle. Have a look here for a bit more information.
In the transmission system, a branch might have impedance Z = R + jX
, where the reactive X
is about 10 times the purely resistive R
.
I'm assuming you're familiar with the per unit system. Let me know if you're not and I'll explain it closer.
Let's just review a few basic relationships first:
\begin{align*} S = V \cdot I^*\\ => I = (S/ V)^*\\ \Delta V = I^2\cdot Z\\ Z = (R + jX) \end{align*}
Let's assume we have a very simple power system that looks like this:
G ---|------------------|------------------|----->
3 Z = R + jX 2 Z = R + jX 1 Load
- G is the generator
- The verticals lines are buses, labeled 1 - 3
- The load is at the end of the radial.
- The voltage at bus 1 is assumed to be 1pu with angle 0 degrees.
- The load is (1 + j0.2) pu. (If S_base = 100MVA, this would be equal to 100MW + 20MVAr)
- Z = 0.01 + j0.1
The current necessary to supply the load is given by:
\begin{align*} I = (S/ V)^* =((1 + j0.2) / 1)^* = 1 - j0.2\\ \end{align*}
No compesation:
The voltage at bus 2 is give by the voltage at bus 1 plus the voltage rise over the cable (seen from 1 to 2):
\begin{align*} V_2 = V_1 + I^2 \cdot Z = (1-j0.2)\cdot(0.01 + j0.1) = 1.054\angle 5.01 ^{\circ}\;\text{pu} \end{align*}
This means the power injection into the cable between 1 and 2 is:
\begin{align*} S_2 = V_2 \cdot I^* = (1.031 + j0.302) \;\text{pu} \end{align*}
The voltage at V3 is:
\begin{align*} V_3 = V_2 + I^2 \cdot Z = 1.11\angle 9.50^{\circ}\;\text{pu} \end{align*}
Now we can find the power output from the generator by using the first equation:
\begin{align*} S_{Gen} = V_3 \cdot I^* = (1.062 + j0.404) \;\text{pu} \end{align*}
With compensation:
Let us add a capacitor that injects 0.3pu reactive power at bus 2.
The voltage at bus 2 is still given by the voltage at bus 1 and the voltage rise over the cable, so it's still \$\underline{1.054 \angle5.01^{\circ}\;\text{pu}}\$.
Now, the reactive power injection of 0.3pu will give a current injection of:
\begin{align*} I_{inj} = (Q / V_2)^* = 0.285 \angle{-85.0}^{\circ}\;\text{pu} \end{align*}
The current through cable 1-2 is equal to the current through cable 2-3 plus the current injection, so:
\begin{align*} I_3 = I_2 - I_{inj} = 0.979\angle 4.90^{\circ}\;\text{pu} \end{align*}
You see that the current magnitude is lower than it was without compensation. So, let's have a look at the voltage at bus 3:
\begin{align*} V_3 = V_2 + {I_3}^2 \cdot Z = 1.06\angle10.22^{\circ}\;\text{pu} \end{align*}
Now we can find the power output from the generator by using the first equation:
\begin{align*} S_{Gen} = V_3 \cdot I_3^* = (1.037 + j0.096)\;\text{pu} \end{align*}
So, to summarize:
W/O comp: W comp:
|V1| 1.000 1.000
|V2| 1.054 1.054
|V3| 1.115 1.060
W/O comp: W comp:
Gen 1.062 + j0.404 1.033 + j0.096
As you can see from the above results, the voltage is much more stable with compensation. The current gets lower through the cable resulting in lower active losses.
The reason why the reactive power is needed in the first place is because it accounts for the magnetization of the equipment. If there's no reactive power, transformers, generator rotors/stators, machines etc. have no magnetic field. With no magnetic field, there is no torque, no magnetic coupling in the transformer etc. So, a lot of equipment have to consume reactive power in order to work. If there's too little reactive power available the equipment will try to draw more current to compensate. This will lead to higher voltage drops, which in the end might cause voltage collapse.
As Andy points out, it can also be used as power factor correction for large industrial loads. However when we're talking about reactive power compensation it's most often because of what I've described above.
In a meshed grid it can also be used to control power flow. This works because the active power flow through a cable is mainly given by the voltage angle difference over it. If you inject reactive power, the voltage and currents angles will change, thus it will affect the power flow. If you inject the right amount at the right place you can redistribute the power flow the way you want (but only to a small extent).
Hope this answers your question!
With R4 and R6 being zero, this means they are essentially a short circuit. You should imagine the initial circuit to look like this:
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
This now becomes much easier to visualise.
however when I solved it I just took out the R3 and R5 so I got a different answer for the current flowing through the voltage source
I believe what happened here is you mistook the meaning. Where you removed them from the circuit, what you should have done is just replaced them with a wire as shown above. When you do this, you can see that R3 and R5 are connected straight across the supply voltage, so there must be current flowing through them. From here, you can re-draw and simplify the circuit to solve.
Best Answer
The converter system should have provisions to provide reactive volt-amperes to inductive loads supplied by the generator. If the converter remains connected to an active grid when the generator is shut down, it may continue to supply reactive VA to those loads. Capacitors in the converter would be supplying VA to inductive loads, not drawing reactive power from the grid.