Electronic – Why is propagation delay of ethernet cables unaffected by cable length

cablescommunicationethernetsignalspeed

I did some searching on how propagation delay in ethernet cables is affected by the cable length. The answer seems to be that the delay is negligible until the cable length reaches a kind of threshold value which imposes a limit on the maximum length of ethernet before it becomes too unreliable. However, propagation delay is distance/speed, so technically a longer cable should have a longer delay. I am assuming the cables have the same diameter.

My guess is that since information is continuously sent in a stream, while it takes longer to initiate the transfer, the rate of data transfer is unaffected. However, the latency would still be slower, which would be a problem. Why is the cable length rarely discussed?

Best Answer

No, there is no threshold as you put it; any length of cable produces a delay and that delay is proportional to cable length. Different cables propagate slower of course and this is largely down to the dielectric of the material between the two conductors (or centre and screen in coax). The higher the capacitance, the slower the speed of propagation.

Regarding maximum length that can be used for a certain data rate yes, there is a "kind of" threshold - basically data gets misshaped the further it has to travel down a cable due to cable losses (resistive and dielectric). At some cable-length and at some data-rate the cable can be deemed to be at the "point of no return" in that statistically the number of data errors incurred are too many to warrant further error correction/detection. Time to get a better cable or different modulation scheme!

Cable length is quite commonly discussed where I work for the reasons highlighted above.