Many people seem to be afraid of mixing stable with testing, but frankly, testing is fairly stable in its own right, and with proper preferences and solution checking, you can avoid the "stability drift" that puts your core packages on the unstable path.
"Testing is fairly stable??", you ask. Yes. In order for a package to migrate from unstable to testing, it has to have zero open bugs for 10 consecutive days. Chances are that, especially for the more popular packages, somebody is going to submit a bug report for an unstable version if something is wrong.
Even if you don't want to mix the environments, it's still nice to have the option there in case you run into something that requires a newer version than what is in stable.
Here's what I recommend for setting this up:
First, create the following files in /etc/apt/preferences.d
:
stable.pref
:
# 500 <= P < 990: causes a version to be installed unless there is a
# version available belonging to the target release or the installed
# version is more recent
Package: *
Pin: release a=stable
Pin-Priority: 900
testing.pref
:
# 100 <= P < 500: causes a version to be installed unless there is a
# version available belonging to some other distribution or the installed
# version is more recent
Package: *
Pin: release a=testing
Pin-Priority: 400
unstable.pref
:
# 0 < P < 100: causes a version to be installed only if there is no
# installed version of the package
Package: *
Pin: release a=unstable
Pin-Priority: 50
experimental.pref
:
# 0 < P < 100: causes a version to be installed only if there is no
# installed version of the package
Package: *
Pin: release a=experimental
Pin-Priority: 1
(Don't be afraid of the unstable/experimental stuff here. The priorities are low enough that it's never going to automatically install any of that stuff. Even the testing branch will behave, as it's only going to install the packages you want to be in testing.)
Now, creating a matching set for /etc/apt/sources.list.d
:
stable.list
: Copy from your original /etc/apt/sources.list
. Rename the old file to something like sources.list.orig
.
testing.list
: Same as stable.list
, except with testing
.
unstable.list
: Same as stable.list
, except with unstable
, and remove the security lists.
experimental.list
: Same as unstable.list
, except with experimental
.
You can also add a oldstable
in sources.lists.d
and preferences.d
(use a priority of 1), though this moniker will tend to expire and disappear before the next stable cycle. In cases like that, you can use http://archive.debian.org/debian/
and "hardcode" the Debian version (etch, lenny, etc.).
To install the testing version of a package, simply use aptitude install lib-foobar-package/testing
, or just jump into aptitude's GUI and select the version inside of the package details (hit enter on the package you're looking at).
If you get complaints of package conflicts, look at the solutions first. In most cases, the first one is going to be "don't install this version". Learn to use the per-package accept/reject resolver choices. For example, if you're installing foobar-package/testing, and the first solution is "don't install foobar-package/testing", then mark that choice as rejected, and the other solutions will never veer to that path again. In cases like these, you'll probably have to install a few other testing packages.
If it's getting too hairy (like it's trying to upgrade libc or the kernel or some other huge core system), then you can either reject those upgrade paths or just back out of the initial upgrade altogether. Remember that it's only going to upgrade stuff to testing/unstable if you allow it to.
EDIT: Fixed some priority pins, and updated the list.
The cause is likely specific to one of your applications.
For us, it was related to Vectorworks 2008. It's a cross-platform app, and seemed to be keeping its own copy of the current directory in the Save/Open dialog, and not using OS X system facilities for this. We've found other bugs related to unescaped paths before (eg. users put slashes in the filename, this gets interpreted as a path separator, etc).
The steps to reproduce were:
- Navigate to server in Vectorworks Open/Save dialog
- Quit application
- Disconnect from server
- Clean up /Volumes and open a Finder window to /Volumes to watch for new ghosts
- Start application
- Use File > Open and watch a ghost share get created as soon as the Open/Save dialog appears. Note that at this stage we are not connected to the server, so the Open/Save dialog retargets to the user's home directory.
The ghost share that gets created in step 6 has the same number suffix as the last real share, strongly suggesting to us that it's a problem with code internal to the application. Ie. if the last real connection was "Active Projects-4" then the application will create a -4 folder, but actually reconnecting to the server will create a mount point with -5, or whatever.
I'm guessing you'll have to go through trial and error with whatever your mix of apps are. One hint: it was strongly suggested for us to look at Vectorworks when we looked at the contents of those ghost shares. Ours were nested subfolders to one path that usually only contained Vectorworks documents (ie. what you get with mkdir -p /path/to/subfolder
).
Best Answer
I have recently worked to find how to mount AFP share (from a NAS). First, my afpfs-ng package refers to this website which gives everything you need.
You can find an example on how to mount the share using /etc/fstab (boot time mount). Here an additional example:
As stated in the previous link, there is another command
afpcmd
that is a simple client (no mounting). Finally, you can also usemount_afp
:(Although, I am actually facing performance issue using
afpfs_ng
.)It is also possible to use the graphical user interface to mount an AFP share. I saw it working with MATE and GNOME (thanks to
gvfs
). You just have to look in "Network" and the server will be presented.