I have this linq query that works well (although it may be written better, pls say so if you notice something)
var qry = BenefitCodes
.Where(b => b.BenInterest != 'E'
&& (b.BenProductLine == CoverageProductLine || b.BenProductLine == null) )
.Select(b => b)
.OrderBy(b => b.BenDesc);
A new requirement came down the pipeline to exclude two BenCodes ( 1001, 1009), BenCodes is just another column in the SQL table.
Am I supposed to use some variation of ".Contains", I would have to do !Contains or something. Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Thanks,
~ck in San Diego
Best Answer
Yes, one way to handle this is the following (for brevity and readability, I am excluding the remainder of your query):
I believe this to be more readable and more maintainable than the alternative of adding a subclause
b.BenCodes != 1001 && b.BenCodes != 1009
to your where clause.