In .NET Core and .NET Framework ≥4.0 there is a generic parse method:
Enum.TryParse("Active", out StatusEnum myStatus);
This also includes C#7's new inline out
variables, so this does the try-parse, conversion to the explicit enum type and initialises+populates the myStatus
variable.
If you have access to C#7 and the latest .NET this is the best way.
Original Answer
In .NET it's rather ugly (until 4 or above):
StatusEnum MyStatus = (StatusEnum) Enum.Parse(typeof(StatusEnum), "Active", true);
I tend to simplify this with:
public static T ParseEnum<T>(string value)
{
return (T) Enum.Parse(typeof(T), value, true);
}
Then I can do:
StatusEnum MyStatus = EnumUtil.ParseEnum<StatusEnum>("Active");
One option suggested in the comments is to add an extension, which is simple enough:
public static T ToEnum<T>(this string value)
{
return (T) Enum.Parse(typeof(T), value, true);
}
StatusEnum MyStatus = "Active".ToEnum<StatusEnum>();
Finally, you may want to have a default enum to use if the string cannot be parsed:
public static T ToEnum<T>(this string value, T defaultValue)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(value))
{
return defaultValue;
}
T result;
return Enum.TryParse<T>(value, true, out result) ? result : defaultValue;
}
Which makes this the call:
StatusEnum MyStatus = "Active".ToEnum(StatusEnum.None);
However, I would be careful adding an extension method like this to string
as (without namespace control) it will appear on all instances of string
whether they hold an enum or not (so 1234.ToString().ToEnum(StatusEnum.None)
would be valid but nonsensical) . It's often be best to avoid cluttering Microsoft's core classes with extra methods that only apply in very specific contexts unless your entire development team has a very good understanding of what those extensions do.
From an int:
YourEnum foo = (YourEnum)yourInt;
From a string:
YourEnum foo = (YourEnum) Enum.Parse(typeof(YourEnum), yourString);
// The foo.ToString().Contains(",") check is necessary for enumerations marked with an [Flags] attribute
if (!Enum.IsDefined(typeof(YourEnum), foo) && !foo.ToString().Contains(","))
{
throw new InvalidOperationException($"{yourString} is not an underlying value of the YourEnum enumeration.")
}
Update:
From number you can also
YourEnum foo = (YourEnum)Enum.ToObject(typeof(YourEnum) , yourInt);
Best Answer
Two ways. Symbols (
:foo
notation) or constants (FOO
notation).Symbols are appropriate when you want to enhance readability without littering code with literal strings.
Constants are appropriate when you have an underlying value that is important. Just declare a module to hold your constants and then declare the constants within that.
Added 2021-01-17
If you are passing the enum value around (for example, storing it in a database) and you need to be able to translate the value back into the symbol, there's a mashup of both approaches
This approach inspired by andrew-grimm's answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/5332950/13468
I'd also recommend reading through the rest of the answers here since there are a lot of ways to solve this and it really boils down to what it is about the other language's enum that you care about