This is a question in very general sense. When we got to analyze very complex schematics, is there any way by which it can be made simpler. Like do we have any key steps to analyze it with.
Simplified analysis of complex circuits
The verbal description of the circuit sounds like this:
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
Unfortunately, this circuit is unsolvable. VCVS1, configured with gain 1, is asked reproduce the voltage present across R1, while simultaneously being forced to 12V plus the voltage across R1. VCVS1 needs non-unity gain in order for this to be solvable.
There is no general method for analyzing a circuit from a schematic. Each piece is something you figure out as you go along. There is no substitute for eventually understanding what the circuit is trying to do and therefore the purpose of each part. Fortunately most large circuits are really a collection of smaller blocks such that the blocks can be somewhat analyzed separately. Once their functions are understood, they become like components of the blocks at the next higher up level. Dividing something into a hierarchy of subsystems is a good way to analyze most anything large, and is likely how a complex circuit was designed in the first place. Ultimately you need to get into the designer's head.
With experience, you will recognize some blocks quickly because you have analyzed something similar before. You know its purpose and don't have to delve into every last detail. Also keep in mind that engineers vary in quality. Just because a schematic is drawn and a product actually built doesn't mean it was designed well. I've seen some pretty horrendous things get produced. These would be prone to failure easily outside nominal conditions, be generally flaky, or whatever. All you really know is that the product works most of the time at close to the nominal intended conditions. Beyond that, be a little skeptical.
Of course this is a common problem, so things that are intended to be repaired in the field should have a "service manual". This will give the schematic, sometimes a little theory of operation, and most importantly, a trouble shooting chart. Since you seem to be doing this professionally, you should be able to get hold of the service manuals.
As a example, here is a quick analisys of the top left block of your schematic:
You should be able to see right away this is the power input block. If nothing else, it says "AC Input" at the left. There are basically two common AC input power blocks. The old ones run the AC input into a big iron transformer that runs at the power line frequency. That will have a secondary, often with multiple taps, to produce the lower voltages which are then rectified and filtered to make the unregulated DC supplies. The more modern kind full wave rectifies the AC line. This DC is then chopped at high frequency and run thru a much smaller transformer to make the AC for the roughly regulated DC supplies.
It should be immediately obvious this AC input is of the second kind. The four diodes in the middle are arranged in a classic full wave bridge configuration. See the diamond shape made by 4 diodes a little right of center. That's a pattern your eyes will pickup quickly with a little experience. If you've never seen one before, think about it a little and see how it works. Once you've done that, you should be able to quickly recognize a full wave bridge next time you see one. The full wave bridge also nicely divides the circuit into the AC part on the left and the DC part on the right. Again, T5 should pop out to you as a classic balun filter, which is something you should expect to see in this kind of AC input block. The rest of the crap left of the balun you can just assume is for filtering and spike suppression with little reason to analyze it in detail.
There is one cute trick here worth noting and filing away for future reference. Note the 230V/115V switch at the top. Analyze the circuit with the switch in the 230V position first. In that mode it is a basic full wave bridge that will charge up the combination of C5 and C6 to the magnitude of the peak voltage difference bewteen the L and N inputs. So far so good. Now mentally throw the switch to the 115V position and think about what is happening very carefully. You should study this in detail yourself, but very breifly there is now a charge pump going on so that plus and minus the peak magnitude will appear accross C5 and C6. This will result in roughly the same DC voltage with 115V input as with 230V input and the switch in the other position.
This method is sortof a hybrid between old and new. More modern AC power input circuits just full wave rectify what comes in and deal with the resulting wider range of DC by adjusting how that is chopped up to drive the internal high frequency power transformer. Most recently designed power supplies now feature "universal power input", generally from 90-260 Volts at 50-60 Hz, which covers wall power accross the globe.
So you should have roughly 325 V total, with about half of that (about 160 V) accross each of C5 and C6.
I'm not going to go thru the whole circuit, but this is how you proceed. Go block by block, keeping in mind the overall problem the designer was trying to address, and that the designer was only human and the circuit you see is probably "good enough" but not necessarily a examplar of excellent design.
- Electronic – complex numbers in linear circuits
- Electronic – Frequency response of a complex circuit
- Amateur question: how circuit analysis methods are applied in “complicated” circuits
- Electronic – 3 Diodes-circuit analysis
- Electronic – Circuit analysis on very complex circuit
- Electronic – Second-Order RLC Circuit and Short Circuits
I don't think there is a simple general rule that lets you break down any complex circuit into small modules to simplify understanding.
The first steps I usually take is to understand what is the circuit's purpose and to find its "interfaces" (power supply, input and output signals). Then I try to examine the "path of the signal" through the circuit, so I can focus on the "important parts".
You need to understand which parts and devices are fundamental for the functionality and which are just "accessory parts" (e.g. for noise suppression, ESD protection).
If you manage to proceed these steps, you usually get a good understanding of the circuit.
In general, like in software development, I think a circuit designer should always provide good documentation in the schematics by simply adding helpful notes to the different parts of the circuit. Unfortunately, often there is not a single note in schematics. Here, hardware designers could learn a lot by their software colleagues...